2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-24748-5_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Control at the Boundary

Abstract: We introduce a scheme for controlling the state of a quantum system by manipulating its boundary conditions. This contrasts with the usual approach based on direct interactions with the system, that is, by adding interaction terms to the Hamiltonian of the system. We address this infinite-dimensional control problem, providing conditions to the existence of dynamics and approximate controllability for a family of quantum one-dimensional systems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will prove now Theorem 2.15, i.e., weak approximate controllability of quantum induction control systems; this is a stronger version of a theorem proven in [6] in the case of Quantum Graphs. In order to do that, we rely on Theorem 5.5 and the stability proven in Theorem 2.9 and Corollary 5.3.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We will prove now Theorem 2.15, i.e., weak approximate controllability of quantum induction control systems; this is a stronger version of a theorem proven in [6] in the case of Quantum Graphs. In order to do that, we rely on Theorem 5.5 and the stability proven in Theorem 2.9 and Corollary 5.3.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As a final remark, let us stress the role played by the group Z as a symmetry of the quantum system. Indeed, using symmetry considerations, we have been able to identify a wide class of self-adjoint extensions, which preserves the topology of the graph (these self-adjoint extensions are obtained by imposing boundary conditions already known in the literature as quasi-δ boundary conditions [9]). Notice that the family of self-adjoint extensions obtained is more general than a merely periodic repetition of the parameters defining the self-adjoint extension at each unit cell.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one of the sources of decoherence in the description of superconducting qubits arises precisely because of the aforementioned truncation to the lowest orders. Hence, it is worth addressing the system in its full generality and try, for instance, to achieve general controllability results, as was done in [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results in this direction have been found for a quantum particle in a one-dimensional cavity with moving walls, which can be transformed into a fixed-boundary problem [20][21][22][23]. More recently, time-dependent boundary conditions in a graph-like manifold, potentially relevant in quantum control theory, have been investigated [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%