2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2001.09250
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum decoherence and relaxation in neutrinos using long-baseline data

Abstract: We investigate the effect of quantum decoherence and relaxation in neutrino oscillations using MINOS and T2K data. The formalism of open quantum systems is used describe the interaction of a neutrino system with the environment, where the strength of the interaction is regulated by a decoherence parameter Γ. We assume an energy dependence parameterized by Γ = γ 0 (E/GeV) n , with n = −2, 0, +2, and study three different scenarios. The MINOS and T2K data present a complementary behavior, with regard to our theo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For energy-enhanced (n < 0) scenarios, the best limits to date were obtained using MINOS (long baseline accelerator) [1400] and KamLAND (reactor) [1401] data, although these are generally less amenable to QG motivated explanations (although such cases can result from lightcone fluctuations due to the neutrino oscillation wavelength dependence). Constraints have also been derived from MINOS and T2K long baseline accelerator data [1402] and from NOνA and T2K [1403].…”
Section: Neutrino Decoherencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For energy-enhanced (n < 0) scenarios, the best limits to date were obtained using MINOS (long baseline accelerator) [1400] and KamLAND (reactor) [1401] data, although these are generally less amenable to QG motivated explanations (although such cases can result from lightcone fluctuations due to the neutrino oscillation wavelength dependence). Constraints have also been derived from MINOS and T2K long baseline accelerator data [1402] and from NOνA and T2K [1403].…”
Section: Neutrino Decoherencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…when coherence is completely lost at large distances) is the average of the unfluctuated oscillations, given by P αβ = j |U αj | 2 |U βj | 2 . This is distinct from socalled relaxation scenarios [36,37] where the limiting case is equal populations of all flavors, as was identified in our previous work for certain ν-VBH interaction models [28]. Differences in these large L limits can in principal be used to distinguish between decoherence scenarios should a signal be detected.…”
Section: Simulating Neutrinos Propagating In Fluctuating Space-timementioning
confidence: 55%
“…These models include quantum decoherence (QD), neutrino absorption, 𝜈 3 decay, and wave packet decoherence (WPD). The new physics models of types (1) - (5) in Table 1 are expressed as power-law dependencies of the exponential form, i.e., exp(−𝛼𝐿𝐸 𝑛 ) with n=0, ±1, and ±2 [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Specifically, the models of types (1), (2), and (3) (𝑛 = −2, 0, and 2) are used to study QD in neutrino oscillations, which may be induced by couplings between the neutrino system and the environment, e.g., quantum gravity or space-time "foam" [6,9,10].…”
Section: Damping Signatures From New Physics Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%