2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.95.245413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum description of the optical response of charged monolayer–thick metallic patch nanoantennas

Abstract: The optical response of small charged metallic nanodisks of one atomic monolayer thickness is analysed under the excitation by an incident plane wave and by a localised point-like dipole. Using the time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) and classical electrodynamical calculations we identify the bright and dark plasmon modes and study their evolution under external charging of the nanostructure. For neutral nanodisks, despite their monolayer thickness, the in-plane optical response, as obtained from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At Φ ATA = 0.4 V, a Schottky barrier forms at the metal−semiconductor interface because of the flat band potential of TiO 2 (Φ fb = −0.6 V vs Ag/AgCl at pH = 7). 67 Under light illumination, excited electrons are generated and injected into the conduction band of TiO 2 . All results show that electron−hole generation is promoted dramatically by the strong photon localization under the modal strong coupling.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At Φ ATA = 0.4 V, a Schottky barrier forms at the metal−semiconductor interface because of the flat band potential of TiO 2 (Φ fb = −0.6 V vs Ag/AgCl at pH = 7). 67 Under light illumination, excited electrons are generated and injected into the conduction band of TiO 2 . All results show that electron−hole generation is promoted dramatically by the strong photon localization under the modal strong coupling.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we propose the energy diagram of this ATA system as in Figure e. At Φ ATA = 0.4 V, a Schottky barrier forms at the metal–semiconductor interface because of the flat band potential of TiO 2 (Φ fb = −0.6 V vs Ag/AgCl at pH = 7) . Under light illumination, excited electrons are generated and injected into the conduction band of TiO 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In all of these methods, the local field properties are usually determined by the smooth boundaries of a nanoscale morphology of the nanostructure (tip or tip‐substrate cavity) with a more or less sophisticated description of the roughness. Even in quantum descriptions of the optical response of metallic cavities, a jellium model [37‐41] of the electron gas, which relies on a smooth description of the electronic density at the metal‐vacuum interface, is often considered as a valid approach to obtain the optical polarization of metallic nanoresonators within the use of the time‐dependent density functional theory (TDDFT). Beyond these continuous approaches, atomistic models that refer the optical response of matter to its atomic constituents provide a roadmap to reveal the role of subnanometric features in metallic cavities and tips that introduce significant differences in the local field distributions around the nanoresonators (tips and/or gaps) and thus on its action onto the molecules deposited nearby [42‐45] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the isolation of graphene [13] and the discovery of the extraordinary plasmonic properties this material has when doped with carriers [14][15][16][17][18][19] has inspired significant interest in stud ying the plasmons supported by metallic nanostructures with thicknesses ranging from several nanometers down to mono layers. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] These nanostructures support very strong fields that lead to increased light-matter interaction [14,24,[35][36][37][38][39] and produce a higher degree of confinement than regular 3D structures, enabling, for instance, the enhancement of higherorder multipolar transitions. [40][41][42] Furthermore, the reduced dimensionality of these nano structures makes it easier to modify their optical response by altering their distribu tion of free carriers, as has been both theo retically proposed [21,43] and experimentally demonstrated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%