2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-461x(2000)80:2<210::aid-qua15>3.0.co;2-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum dynamics of laser- and field-induced desorption of molecules from metal surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in order to investigate the role of the electric field in the vicinity of the STM tip for the switching process, a simple model following refs and was set up by introducing a shift, V = V 0 + V el of the ground state potential energy surface V 0 due to the electrostatic interaction of the electric field E z (approximated as being homogeneous) between STM tip and sample with a vertical dipole μ z between the charged adsorbate molecule and its image charge in the metallic substrate. Neglecting higher electric moments, this interaction energy is given by V el = prefix− μ z E z = prefix− 2 d z Q E z with total charge Q of the adsorbate molecule, evaluated by summation over atomic charges q i at positions z i obtained from Bader analysis; d z denotes the vertical distance of the center of charge modulus z coc = 1/(| Q |)∑ i | q i | z i from the surface mirror plane, the latter being defined as the average z-coordinate of Ag atoms in the uppermost substrate layer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in order to investigate the role of the electric field in the vicinity of the STM tip for the switching process, a simple model following refs and was set up by introducing a shift, V = V 0 + V el of the ground state potential energy surface V 0 due to the electrostatic interaction of the electric field E z (approximated as being homogeneous) between STM tip and sample with a vertical dipole μ z between the charged adsorbate molecule and its image charge in the metallic substrate. Neglecting higher electric moments, this interaction energy is given by V el = prefix− μ z E z = prefix− 2 d z Q E z with total charge Q of the adsorbate molecule, evaluated by summation over atomic charges q i at positions z i obtained from Bader analysis; d z denotes the vertical distance of the center of charge modulus z coc = 1/(| Q |)∑ i | q i | z i from the surface mirror plane, the latter being defined as the average z-coordinate of Ag atoms in the uppermost substrate layer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, the desorption by a static electric field, under an STM tip for example, should also be possible. In refs and , it was found that for an ammonia molecule, bound by 0.7 eV, a critical field strength of about 1 V/Å would be needed. This is unfeasable for an STM experiment on a metal surface, but in the case of semiconductors and/or for less strongly bound adsorbates, static field desorption may be possible.…”
Section: 1 Direct Resonant Excitation Of the Adsorbate−surface Bondmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also for this system representative, dissipative two-state models of the type used in equation ( 17) have been devised. These models are either one dimensional, with the desorption coordinate, Z , being the one mode considered [67,68,146,147,87,88,[148][149][150][151][152], or two dimensional, either with Z and the NO distance r [90,91,[153][154][155][156], or Z and polar angle θ [157,158] included. The 2D (r , Z ) model has also been used for nonadiabatic scattering of NO from Pt (111) [159].…”
Section: Hydrogen Desorption From Si (100)2 ×mentioning
confidence: 99%