2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41567-018-0414-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum error correction and universal gate set operation on a binomial bosonic logical qubit

Abstract: Logical qubit encoding and quantum error correction (QEC) have been experimentally demonstrated in various physical systems with multiple physical qubits, however, logical operations are challenging due to the necessary nonlocal operations. Alternatively, logical qubits with bosonic-mode-encoding are of particular interest because their QEC protection is hardware efficient, but gate operations on QEC protected logical qubits remain elusive. Here, we experimentally demonstrate full control on a single logical q… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
161
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
161
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, instead of a convex combination of quasiextreme channels as demonstrated, our experimental architecture with ultrafast adaptive control is also suitable for implementing an arbitrary Liouvillian L = ∑ j L j by alternatively and piecewisely simulating its components L j [Supplementary Information]. In addition, although our experimental results show high fidelity of state generation by the simulated quantum channel, further improvement calls for incorporating quantum error correction [31,32] into this scheme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, instead of a convex combination of quasiextreme channels as demonstrated, our experimental architecture with ultrafast adaptive control is also suitable for implementing an arbitrary Liouvillian L = ∑ j L j by alternatively and piecewisely simulating its components L j [Supplementary Information]. In addition, although our experimental results show high fidelity of state generation by the simulated quantum channel, further improvement calls for incorporating quantum error correction [31,32] into this scheme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1(c)] to assist the unitary operations on the system qubit, e.g., implementing a controlled-phase (CZ) gate and As schematically shown in Fig. 1(d), our experimental device consists of a superconducting transmon qubit dispersively coupled to two waveguide cavity resonators [24,32,[37][38][39][40]. One of the cavities (storage cavity) has long photon coherence times T s 1 = 143 µs and T s 2 = 250 µs, and its |0 and |1 Fock states constitute the two bases of a photonic qubit (the system qubit) on which the QCS are performed.…”
Section: A Principle and Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimal control algorithm in our unit has been validated against real hardware and used in real experimental environments [16,17].…”
Section: Optimal Control Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, existing programmable quantum hardware mostly focuses on supporting the data ow. ey cannot well support the control ow because they lack programmable feedback with su cient exibility [19][20][21] (though feedback has been demonstrated with customized hardware in multiple experiments [7,[22][23][24]). e di culty of supporting programmable feedback in the hardware roots in the strict requirements on the electrical signals (e.g., precise parameters and timing) used to control qubits.…”
Section: Comprehensive Abstraction Challengementioning
confidence: 99%