2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2201.00752
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum error mitigation via matrix product operators

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining with the matrix product operator encoding of errors discussed in Ref. [21] has potentially only constant overhead in circuit depth if the staircase of state and MPO unitaries are aligned (in a similar manner to the interferometric measurement of topological string order parameters in Ref. [15]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Combining with the matrix product operator encoding of errors discussed in Ref. [21] has potentially only constant overhead in circuit depth if the staircase of state and MPO unitaries are aligned (in a similar manner to the interferometric measurement of topological string order parameters in Ref. [15]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may be advantages in combining tensor network methods with machine learning tools [18][19][20] to extract simulation results as used recently in classical numerics. Moreover, there is potentially excellent fit between tensor network simulation methods and matrix product operator-based error mitigation [21,22]. While we focus on one-dimensional matrix product states (MPS), reflecting the limitations of current devices, translations of these methods to higher dimensions have been proposed [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quasi-probability method [41,42] for quantum error mitigation and its variants [23,[43][44][45] involve the simulation of the inverse of noise channels with physically implementable quantum channels. The sampling cost for implementing an HPTP map N is characterized by its physical implementability [13,15], defined as…”
Section: Physical Implementability For Mixed Unitary Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Supplemental Material, we provide the upper and lower bounds for the physical implementability in terms of the maximum and minimum eigenvalues of the Choi matrix [25], which may inspire efficient estimation methods for the physical implementability with numerical approaches, such as the tensor network representation [46][47][48] of a general noise channel [44], instead of solving the entire optimization problem. 9…”
Section: Physical Implementability For Mixed Unitary Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%