2014
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/23/6/060302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Fisher information and spin squeezing in one-axis twisting model

Abstract: Abstract. We consider the quantum Fisher information and spin squeezing in oneaxis twisting model with a coherent spin state |θ 0 , φ 0 . We analytically discuss the dependence of the two parameters: spin squeezing parameter ξ 2 K and the average parameter estimation precision χ 2 on the polar angle θ 0 and the azimuth angle φ 0 . Moreover, we discuss the effects of the collisional dephasing on the dynamics of the two parameters. In this case, the analytical solution of ξ 2 K is also obtained.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(168 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that, in the setting as mentioned above, the QFIs for the states before and after the second beams splitter are identical due to the invariance property of the QFI under a phase-independent unitary evolution [18,19]. We below take the CFI and QFI as the two figure of merits, as they are widely used to evaluate the performance of various metrological applications [25,26,27,28,29,30,15,14,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Hence, an efficient way to identify a measurement being optimal for a quantum phase estimation task is to test whether the QFI and the CFI with respect to a specific measurement are identical [23,37].…”
Section: Optimal Measurements For Linear Phase Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, in the setting as mentioned above, the QFIs for the states before and after the second beams splitter are identical due to the invariance property of the QFI under a phase-independent unitary evolution [18,19]. We below take the CFI and QFI as the two figure of merits, as they are widely used to evaluate the performance of various metrological applications [25,26,27,28,29,30,15,14,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Hence, an efficient way to identify a measurement being optimal for a quantum phase estimation task is to test whether the QFI and the CFI with respect to a specific measurement are identical [23,37].…”
Section: Optimal Measurements For Linear Phase Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 1). The elements of the two-quibt reduced density matrix can be represented by the local expectation values for the one-axis twisting state [28][29][30][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]…”
Section: Initial States and Noise Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated from the recent study on the dynamics of QD and GMQD under the influence of external environments for different multipartite states [33], such as Werner-GHZ type three-qubit and six-qubit states, we here devote to examining the pairwise quantum correlation properties in terms of QD for pairs of particles extracted from a symmetric state. The two-particle density matrix is expressed in terms of expectation values of collective spin operators S for the large system [28][29][30][34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kitagawa and Ueda [9] further proposed two different mechanisms, one-and two-axis twisting models, for the * liujingphys@hust.edu.cn generation of spin squeezed states. The one-axis twisting (OAT) model [16][17][18][19][20][21] can provide a precision limit at the scaling N −2/3 (N is the particle number) and the two-axis twisting (TAT) model [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] provides a better scaling N −1 . These advantages motivate the scientists to try to realize these models in experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%