Strongly Correlated Fermions and Bosons in Low-Dimensional Disordered Systems 2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0530-2_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum In-Plane Magnetoresistance in 2D Electron Systems

Abstract: We review various aspects of magnetoresistance in (quasi-)twodimensional systems subject to an in-plane magnetic field. Concentrating on single-particle effects, three mechanisms leading to magnetoresistance are discussed: the orbital effect of the magnetic field -due to inter-subband mixing -and the sensitivity of this effect to the geometrical symmetry of the system, the interplay between spin-orbit coupling and Zeeman splitting, and the influence of the field on spin scattering at magnetic impurities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result, also given in 43 , is a finite-temperature generalization of the expression used by Benoit et al 59 A rigorous theoretical calculation of the Aharonov-Bohm oscillation amplitude ∆G h/e in presence of magnetic impurities under a large externally applied magnetic field was first presented by Fal'ko. 60 .…”
Section: Appendix C: Magnetic Field Dependence Of Spin-flip Scatsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…This result, also given in 43 , is a finite-temperature generalization of the expression used by Benoit et al 59 A rigorous theoretical calculation of the Aharonov-Bohm oscillation amplitude ∆G h/e in presence of magnetic impurities under a large externally applied magnetic field was first presented by Fal'ko. 60 .…”
Section: Appendix C: Magnetic Field Dependence Of Spin-flip Scatsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The irrelevancy of the inelastic vertex for processes with typical energy transfer larger than 1= ' has been observed before by several authors (e.g., [11,14,17]): Semiclassically, vertex corrections describe the interference of two (time-reversed) electrons undergoing an interaction process [see Fig. 2(a)].…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The logarithmic increase in the magnetoconductivity at large B , as shown in Fig. 4a, was observed in all devices irrespective of doping level, and known to represent suppression of weak localization due to the finite width of the δ-layers [36]. However, the negative magnetoconductivity around B = 0 often indicates the presence of local moments, because localization strengthens as phase coherence increases with the freezing of spin-flip scattering [36,37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, the negative magnetoconductivity around B = 0 often indicates the presence of local moments, because localization strengthens as phase coherence increases with the freezing of spin-flip scattering [36,37]. In such a case, the activated spin-flip processes across the Zeeman gap, leads to magnetoconductivity decreasing linearly with B as ∆σ(B ) = −ηB /T , where η ∼ e 2 g imp µ B /hk B , and g imp is the g-factor of the magnetic impurity [36]. As shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%