2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.123.213601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Interference between Photons from an Atomic Ensemble and a Remote Atomic Ion

Abstract: Advances in the distribution of quantum information will likely require entanglement shared across a hybrid quantum network [1][2][3]. Many entanglement protocols require the generation of indistinguishable photons between the various nodes of the network [4,5]. This is challenging in a hybrid environment due to typically large differences in the spectral and temporal characteristics of single photons generated in different systems [1]. Here we show, for the first time, quantum interference between photons gen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The achieved visibilities and coincidence rates in our experiments would already allow for remote ion entanglement over tens of kilometers. Consider the entanglement swapping protocol of [8], which leads to maximal entanglement of two remote (ion) qubits with state fidelity F (T )=(1 + V (T ))/2 [32] at a heralded rate R swap (T ) ∝ R gen × C ⊥ (T ), where R gen is the photon-generation attempt rate at each ion-trap network node. Using R gen = 30 kHz, the achieved values without photon conversion ( Figure 2) would allow for 3 km ion-ion entanglement distribution with F (T = 9µs) = 0.736 ± 0.004 at a rate of R swap (9µs) = 30 Hz.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The achieved visibilities and coincidence rates in our experiments would already allow for remote ion entanglement over tens of kilometers. Consider the entanglement swapping protocol of [8], which leads to maximal entanglement of two remote (ion) qubits with state fidelity F (T )=(1 + V (T ))/2 [32] at a heralded rate R swap (T ) ∝ R gen × C ⊥ (T ), where R gen is the photon-generation attempt rate at each ion-trap network node. Using R gen = 30 kHz, the achieved values without photon conversion ( Figure 2) would allow for 3 km ion-ion entanglement distribution with F (T = 9µs) = 0.736 ± 0.004 at a rate of R swap (9µs) = 30 Hz.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A twofold coincidence projects the two ions into an entangled state. In such an entanglement swapping experiment, the fidelity F (with respect to a maximally entangled two qubit state) of the two ion state can be shown to be proportional to the HOM visibility V [32]. Furthermore, the rate at which the entangled states are created is related to the success probability P succ defined in Eq.…”
Section: Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reduces the range of ion quantum networks and prevents the integration of these networks into existing telecommunications infrastructure. Of particular interest are photons produced via S-P dipole transitions, enabling direct entanglement between the photons and commonly used ground state qubits of ions such as Yb + [1,3,5,7,8,12], Ba + [3,11,12,[16][17][18], and Ca + [6,9,10]. Ground-state qubits currently demonstrate the longest coherence times in trapped ions [8], as well as the highest two-qubit gate fidelities [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantum frequency conversion (QFC) has been used by trapped ion groups to down-convert ion-emitted photons in the near-IR (≈ 850 nm) to telecom wavelengths [13][14][15], greatly improving potential networking range, though not using photons directly entangled with ground state qubits. QFC of visible (493 nm) ion-emitted photons, which may be directly entangled with ground state ion qubits, to the near IR (≈ 780 nm) [16,17] has been demonstrated, serving to both increase networking range and providing a pathway for the implementation of hybrid networks using both trapped ion and neutral atomic systems [17][18][19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation