2014
DOI: 10.1021/bi5003713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Mechanical Analysis of Nonenzymatic Nucleotidyl Transfer Reactions: Kinetic and Thermodynamic Effects of β–γ Bridging Groups of dNTP Substrates

Abstract: Rate (k) and equilibrium (K) constants for the reaction of tetrahydrofuranol with a series of Mg2+ complexes of methyl triphosphate analogues, CH3O-P(O2)-O-P(O2)-X-PO34–, X = O, CH2, CHCH3, C(CH3)2, CFCH3, CHF, CHCl, CHBr, CFCl, CF2, CCl2, and CBr2, forming phosphate diester and pyrophosphate or bisphosphonate in aqueous solution were evaluated by B3LYP/TZVP//HF/6-31G* quantum chemical calculations and Langevin dipoles and polarized continuum solvation models. The calculated log k and log K values were found t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…76 The EVB reaction free energy of 19.5 kcal mol –1 for the IS1 → IS2 step was obtained as followswhere Δ g EVB,water ‡ = 23.1 kcal mol –1 is the activation free energy of the IS1 → IS2 step (eq 5), ΔΔ g 0 ‡ = −2.6 kcal mol –1 is the difference between the reaction and activation free energies used by Florián et al, 57 and c = −1.0 kcal mol –1 is the correction introduced in this study to make the intermediate observable on the EVB free-energy surface and to change the rate-limiting step in aqueous solution from the IS2 → PS to the IS1 → IS2 step, in accordance with ref (69). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…76 The EVB reaction free energy of 19.5 kcal mol –1 for the IS1 → IS2 step was obtained as followswhere Δ g EVB,water ‡ = 23.1 kcal mol –1 is the activation free energy of the IS1 → IS2 step (eq 5), ΔΔ g 0 ‡ = −2.6 kcal mol –1 is the difference between the reaction and activation free energies used by Florián et al, 57 and c = −1.0 kcal mol –1 is the correction introduced in this study to make the intermediate observable on the EVB free-energy surface and to change the rate-limiting step in aqueous solution from the IS2 → PS to the IS1 → IS2 step, in accordance with ref (69). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Recent ab initio QM calculations of a model reaction between tetrahydrofuranol and methyl triphosphate have suggested that IS2 does not exist, 69 which means that the reaction scheme of the uncatalyzed reaction between 2′-deoxyribose (dRib) and dNTP can be simplified intoWe removed IS2 in the FEP/EVB free-energy profiles by increasing the reaction free energy (Δ g 0 ) of the IS1 → IS2 step by about 3 kcal mol –1 , which resulted in the free energy of IS2 being almost equal to TS2 and TS3. When we applied the same free-energy shift to IS2 in the free-energy profiles of the reactions catalyzed by Polβ and Polλ, we also obtained a flat free-energy surface from TS2 to TS3The absence of IS2 in the water, Polβ, and Polλ systems means that, using the terminology offered by Lassila et al, 83 the O nuc –P α bond formation and the P α –O lg bond cleavage reactions are concerted, 30,44,48,49,75,84 and, unlike T7 DNA polymerase, 57 the studied enzymes do not change the concertedness of the reactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The activation energy, however, turns out to be 42.6 kcal/mol, suggesting that the enzyme significantly reduces the activation energy of the reaction. In contrast, on the basis of DFT and Hatree Fock calculations, Zhang et al estimated the activation free energy for DNA polarization in solution to be 30.5 kcal/mol 46 . Similar to our results, in their calculated RDTS the P–O nuc and P–O lg are 2.06 Å and 1.88 Å, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proton transfer from the nucleophilic water to the Asp83 immediately follows the phosphorous bond forming and bond breaking steps in a concerted mechanism ( Figure 5). The reaction is initiated by the attack of the nucleophilic water, leading to an associative pathway for the phosphate cleavage that has been identified in solution and in several enzymes that carry out phosphate cleavage or transfer (see e.g., Florián et al [53][54] and Klahn et al 55 ). This mechanism is also consistent with the experimentally observed pH change that is used to directly follow the reaction kinetics, 56 and with the lack of observed intermediates for the phosphate hydrolysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%