2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01375-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum mechanics as classical statistical mechanics with an ontic extension and an epistemic restriction

Abstract: Where does quantum mechanics part ways with classical mechanics? How does quantum randomness differ fundamentally from classical randomness? We cannot fully explain how the theories differ until we can derive them within a single axiomatic framework, allowing an unambiguous account of how one theory is the limit of the other. Here we derive non-relativistic quantum mechanics and classical statistical mechanics within a common framework. The common axioms include conservation of average energy and conservation … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
103
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…t /2to hold simultaneously, and validate the uncertainty relation(31). These inequalities impose an upper bound for time as a function of σ 0 , in such a way that the greater σ 0 the greater the time domain within which the irrealities are valid nonnegative quantities and the discretized model applies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…t /2to hold simultaneously, and validate the uncertainty relation(31). These inequalities impose an upper bound for time as a function of σ 0 , in such a way that the greater σ 0 the greater the time domain within which the irrealities are valid nonnegative quantities and the discretized model applies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…We have also argued in Ref [18] that the epistemic restriction of Eqs. (2) or (6) 6) and (3) to further respect the conservation of average energy and trajectories (probability current) [18]. This includes those that describe quantum dynamical interactions between subsystems, generating quantum entanglement.…”
Section: =ô (See Sectionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…, N. It describes a momentum field fluctuating randomly due to the fluctuation of ξ. As argued in Ref [18],. Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations