“…The present author believes, like several other physicists [see e.g. Ali (2009); Ballentine (1970); Belinfante (1975); Blokhintsev (1964); Einstein (1936); Kemble (1929); Krüger (2004); Margenau (1935); Newman (1980); Pippard (1986); Ross-Bonney (1975); Toyozawa (1992); Tschudi (1987); Young (1980)] that QT is a purely statistical theory whose predictions can only be used to describe the behavior of statistical ensembles and not of individual particles. This statistical interpretation (SI) of QT eliminates all mysteries and paradoxes -and this shows that the mysteries and paradoxes are not part of QT itself but rather the result of a particular (mis)interpretation of QT.…”