2002
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.65.022306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum mechanics gives stability to a Nash equilibrium

Abstract: We consider a slightly modified version of the Rock-Scissors-Paper (RSP) game from the point of view of evolutionary stability. In its classical version the game has a mixed Nash equilibrium (NE) not stable against mutants. We find a quantized version of the RSP game for which the classical mixed NE becomes stable.Comment: Revised on referee's criticism, submitted to Physical Review

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have already mentioned how the selection of different initial superpositions can lead to different quantum games [21,25,27]. Is it possible to construct a quantum game where, by choosing a suitable superposition for the initial state, the resulting games can be individually losing but the superposition of the results produces a positive payoff?…”
Section: Discussion and Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We have already mentioned how the selection of different initial superpositions can lead to different quantum games [21,25,27]. Is it possible to construct a quantum game where, by choosing a suitable superposition for the initial state, the resulting games can be individually losing but the superposition of the results produces a positive payoff?…”
Section: Discussion and Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another way of achieving similar results is simply to dispense with the entanglement operators and simply hypothesize various initial states, an approach first used by Marinatto and Weber [21] and since used by other authors [25,27]. The essential difference to Eisert's scheme is the absence of a disentangling operator.…”
Section: B a General Prescriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations