2001
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum networks for concentrating entanglement

Abstract: If two parties, Alice and Bob, share some number, n, of partially entangled pairs of qubits, then it is possible for them to concentrate these pairs into some smaller number of maximally entangled states. We present a simplified version of the algorithm for such entanglement concentration, and we describe efficient networks for implementing these operations.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Schmidt projection method requires at least two nonmaximally entangled pairs and becomes efficient for large numbers of pairs. It is based on a collective measurement (of the "Hamming weight" [127]) of all qubits at one side projecting all pairs onto a subspace spanned by states having a common Schmidt coefficient. The measurement result is then classically communicated to the other side (alternatively, the same collective measurement performed at the other side would yield the same result and make classical communication dispensable).…”
Section: Entanglement Distillationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Schmidt projection method requires at least two nonmaximally entangled pairs and becomes efficient for large numbers of pairs. It is based on a collective measurement (of the "Hamming weight" [127]) of all qubits at one side projecting all pairs onto a subspace spanned by states having a common Schmidt coefficient. The measurement result is then classically communicated to the other side (alternatively, the same collective measurement performed at the other side would yield the same result and make classical communication dispensable).…”
Section: Entanglement Distillationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hayden and Winter (2003) characterized the classical communication cost of entanglement dilution, as did Harrow and Lo (2004). Kaye and Mosca (2001) developed practical networks for entanglement concentration, and recently, Blume-Kohout et al (2014) took this line of research a step further by considering streaming protocols for entanglement concentration. Hayashi and Matsumoto (2001) also developed protocols for universal entanglement concentration.…”
Section: History and Further Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. x k−1 ) for k = n. The Hamming weight can be efficiently computed as shown in [KM01]. Then we simply need to reversibly compute the ω k satisfying cos 2 (2πω k ) = αx 1 x 2 ...x k−1 0 αx 1 x 2 ...x k−1 2 + poly(ǫ).…”
Section: Efficiency: An Examplementioning
confidence: 99%