2019
DOI: 10.1002/qute.201800091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Networks with Deterministic Spin–Photon Interfaces

Abstract: This report considers how recent experimental progress on deterministic solid‐state spin–photon interfaces enables the construction of a number of key elements of quantum networks. After reviewing some of the recent experimental achievements, a discussion of their integration into Bell state analyzers, quantum non‐demolition detection, and photonic cluster state generation is presented. Finally, it is outlined how these elements can be used for long‐distance entanglement generation and quantum key distribution… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In more recent work, Vinay and Kok show how to improve the runtime using results from complex analysis [46]. However, this method still remains exponential in the number arXiv:1912.07688v1 [quant-ph] 16 Dec 2019 of repeater segments. Here, we provide two algorithms for computing the full distribution of the waiting time and fidelity following the same model as in [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In more recent work, Vinay and Kok show how to improve the runtime using results from complex analysis [46]. However, this method still remains exponential in the number arXiv:1912.07688v1 [quant-ph] 16 Dec 2019 of repeater segments. Here, we provide two algorithms for computing the full distribution of the waiting time and fidelity following the same model as in [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…← uniform random sample from [0, 1] retry , w retry ← sample_swap(n)13 return t + t retry , w retry 14 end 15 end16 Auxiliary function sample_dist(n, d) :17 if d = 0 then 18 return sample_swap(n − 1) 19 else 20 (t A , w A ) ← sample_dist(n, d − 1) 21 (t B , w B ) ← sample_dist(n, d − 1) 22 t, w ← g D ((t A , w A ), (t B , w B ))// eq. (24) ← uniform random sample from [0, 1] // Success probability: eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrated quantum emitters can provide not only photonic qubits but also spin qubits. Therefore, incorporating quantum-specific components, such as quantum memories and quantum gates, as well as coherent nonlinear optical elements based on stationary qubits, enable a wider range of photonic quantum information processing schemes [153] [ Table 2] and new opportunities for exploiting quantum optics. For example, solid-state quantum emitters with a ground-state spin can mediate photon-photon interactions and store the information for a long time [154].…”
Section: Spin-photon Quantum Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrically controlled quantum devices can be envisioned for the detection of spin signals and single-photon excitation [22][23][24][25], however, integration of electrically and optically controlled devices appear at an early stage.SiC and other materials have been proposed as a platform for spin-based photonic quantum technologies. The light-matter interface relating quantum light states and the quantum emitter internal states (electron spin) can be used to constitute quantum circuits and networks [26], where quantum entanglement distribution and storage is performed [27]. Solid-state emitters can perform such interfacing role in a scalable and in a compact way due to their atom-and ion-like properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SiC and other materials have been proposed as a platform for spin-based photonic quantum technologies. The light-matter interface relating quantum light states and the quantum emitter internal states (electron spin) can be used to constitute quantum circuits and networks [26], where quantum entanglement distribution and storage is performed [27]. Solid-state emitters can perform such interfacing role in a scalable and in a compact way due to their atom-and ion-like properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%