2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3364936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum noise in a terahertz hot electron bolometer mixer

Abstract: We have measured the noise temperature of a single, sensitive superconducting NbN hot electron bolometer (HEB) mixer in a frequency range from 1.6 to 5.3 THz, using a setup with all the key components in vacuum. By analyzing the measured receiver noise temperature using a quantum noise (QN) model for HEB mixers, we confirm the effect of QN. The QN is found to be responsible for about half of the receiver noise at the highest frequency in our measurements. The β-factor (the quantum efficiency of the HEB) obtain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
55
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
55
4
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Such mixers have superior performance over other types of mixers (e.g., SIS, Schottky diodes) 2 at frequencies higher than 1.2 THz. [3][4][5] A large RF bandwidth, a low noise temperature, and low LO power requirements determined the choice of NbN HEB mixers for the Herschel space observatory. 6,7 In contrast to SIS mixers, the useful IF bandwidth of NbN HEB mixers is practically limited to 3-5 GHz, 8 as the noise temperature rises drastically at higher intermediate frequencies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Such mixers have superior performance over other types of mixers (e.g., SIS, Schottky diodes) 2 at frequencies higher than 1.2 THz. [3][4][5] A large RF bandwidth, a low noise temperature, and low LO power requirements determined the choice of NbN HEB mixers for the Herschel space observatory. 6,7 In contrast to SIS mixers, the useful IF bandwidth of NbN HEB mixers is practically limited to 3-5 GHz, 8 as the noise temperature rises drastically at higher intermediate frequencies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Ref. 32, fundamentally our HEB mixer has the same classical output noise level ͑35 K due to Johnson noise and thermal fluctuation noise͒ at any LO frequency between 1.5-5.3 THz and has a similar mixer conversion loss. The only factors that can affect T rec DSB at 5.25 THz are the radiation coupling efficiency between free space and the HEB and the quantum noise.…”
Section: B Receiver Noise Temperature At 525 Thzmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…astronomical observations over the [1][2][3][4][5] THz range were performed with order of magnitude of improved sensitivities, compared to previous satellite missions. This far-infrared region cannot be explored from ground-based telescopes (with the exception of narrow frequency windows observable from high altitude locations).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For high resolution spectroscopy using heterodyne receivers, only recently did the detector sensitivities start approaching their fundamental noise limit up to very high frequencies [5][6] and the next step is now to increase the receiver pixels count in order to gain observing efficiency when observing extended sources. The review papers [7][8] summarize the current status of multi-pixel heterodyne array receivers for the sub-mm, far-infrared region and present general design considerations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%