2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-14489-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum non-demolition measurement of a many-body Hamiltonian

Abstract: An ideal quantum measurement collapses the wave function of a quantum system to an eigenstate of the measured observable, with the corresponding eigenvalue determining the measurement outcome. For a quantum non-demolition (QND) observable, i.e., one that commutes with the Hamiltonian generating the system's time evolution, repeated measurements yield the same result, corresponding to measurements with minimal disturbance. This concept applies universally to single quantum particles as well as to complex many-b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(123 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3)] where in addition to the unitary evolutionÛ (in our example generated by the Quantum Ising Model) there is a stochastic measurement process on each siteM = L i=1M (r) i . 27,28,29]. Also in this case entanglement phase transitions have been identified [22,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…(3)] where in addition to the unitary evolutionÛ (in our example generated by the Quantum Ising Model) there is a stochastic measurement process on each siteM = L i=1M (r) i . 27,28,29]. Also in this case entanglement phase transitions have been identified [22,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…More recently, a number of ideas have been developed for tackling classically intractable regimes. These include a self-verifying technique for simulations of the Lattice-Schwinger model [1], a method based on non-demolition measurements of the Hamiltonian [2] and the broader concept of crossplatform verification, i.e. comparing results for the same problem from different quantum hardware or the measurement of compatible correlation functions that can verify specific Hamiltonians even when the quantum dynamics cannot be classically simulated [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet faster transition to the ordered phase can be obtained for the feedback signal containing the derivative of the measured photo-current as in the classical PID-controlled systems. These results demonstrate the advantages one can have with the feedback phase transition in atom-optical systems, which can lead to new types 21 of time crystals [51][52][53] and Floquet engineering, as well as creation of novel quantum bath simulators 21 , in particular, in many-body systems 13,22,[73][74][75] , as well as tuning the universality class of phase transitions 21 . It will be intriguing to study, how more advanced methods than the feedback control can influence quantum systems, for example, applying the digital methods of machine learning and artificial intelligence in real time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%