2016
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.94.023834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum optical metrology in the lossy SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers

Abstract: We study the phase sensitivity in the conventional SU (2) and nonconventional SU (1, 1) interferometers with the coherent and squeezed vacuum input state via the quantum Cramer-Rao bound. We explicitly construct the detection scheme that gives the optimal phase sensitivity. For practical purposes, we show that in the presence of photon loss, both interferometers with proper homodyne detections, are nearly optimal. We also find that unlike the coherent state and squeezed vacuum state, the effects of the imperfe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we address the degrading effects owing to the experimental imperfections, extending our treatment to include these in the analysis of the FI. In most interesting cases, the photon-loss process, determined by a given strength η loss , and the nonunit efficiency detection, designated by η eff , can be regarded as the major limits to interferometric precision [21,22,25,26,28,38,55,56,[81][82][83][84]. Furthermore, it is customary to assume that the environmental noise and photonloss mechanism act identically and independently upon each probe mode [85], and that the environment is in a thermal state at a temperature determined by the mean photon number n th .…”
Section: Photon-loss Effects and Nonunit Efficiency Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we address the degrading effects owing to the experimental imperfections, extending our treatment to include these in the analysis of the FI. In most interesting cases, the photon-loss process, determined by a given strength η loss , and the nonunit efficiency detection, designated by η eff , can be regarded as the major limits to interferometric precision [21,22,25,26,28,38,55,56,[81][82][83][84]. Furthermore, it is customary to assume that the environmental noise and photonloss mechanism act identically and independently upon each probe mode [85], and that the environment is in a thermal state at a temperature determined by the mean photon number n th .…”
Section: Photon-loss Effects and Nonunit Efficiency Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we address the degrading effects owning to the experimental imperfections, extending our treatment to include these in the analysis of the FI. In most interesting cases, the photon-loss process, determined by a given strength η loss , and the nonunit-efficiency detection, designated by η eff , can be regarded as the major limits to interferometric precision [17,18,21,23,34,50,51,[75][76][77][78]. Furthermore, it is customary to assume that the environmental noise and photon-loss mechanism act identically and independently upon each probe mode [79], as well as the environment is in a thermal state at a temperature determined by the mean photon number n th .…”
Section: Photon-loss Effects and Nonunit-efficiency Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In optical interferometry, a coherent-light-based strategy is most commonly used but its sensitivity for phase estimation is shot-noise limited, namely ϕ 2 N −1 . If one needs to achieve a finer precision given a finite amount of resources, one has to resort to interferometry with nonclassical states, such as the coherent squeezed state [9], two-mode squeezedvacuum [10,11], NOON states [12], and squeezed vacuum states [13][14][15]. For works relating to Gaussian state quantum metrology, see, e.g., Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%