2012
DOI: 10.1063/pt.3.1640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum optomechanics

Abstract: Aided by optical cavitiesand superconductingcircuits, researchers are coaxing ever-larger objects to wiggle, shake, and flex in ways that are distinctly quantum mechanical.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
403
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 413 publications
(407 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
403
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By inspection of (71) and (72), we see that these thresholds are quite similar. However, the electrodynamic Q factor of SC microwave cavities is typically on the order of 10 10 [19], whereas the typical mechanical Q factor for the best opto-mechanical oscillators, which are composed of non-SC materials in the ongoing opto-mechanical experiments, is at most on the order of 10 5 [18]. Therefore the question naturally arises whether it is possible to replace these low-Q, non-SC mechanical oscillators, with high-Q SC mechanical oscillators, in which their mechanical Q can approach the typical electrodynamic Q ∼ 10 10 of SC microwave cavities.…”
Section: The Dynamical Casimir Effect Via Parametric Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By inspection of (71) and (72), we see that these thresholds are quite similar. However, the electrodynamic Q factor of SC microwave cavities is typically on the order of 10 10 [19], whereas the typical mechanical Q factor for the best opto-mechanical oscillators, which are composed of non-SC materials in the ongoing opto-mechanical experiments, is at most on the order of 10 5 [18]. Therefore the question naturally arises whether it is possible to replace these low-Q, non-SC mechanical oscillators, with high-Q SC mechanical oscillators, in which their mechanical Q can approach the typical electrodynamic Q ∼ 10 10 of SC microwave cavities.…”
Section: The Dynamical Casimir Effect Via Parametric Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Figure represents an "optomechanical" parametric amplifier, which becomes, above threshold, a parametric oscillator, whose active element is the central vibrating SC wire (indicated in red), placed across the middle of an extremely high-Q SC microwave cavity. Here, instead of using optical cavities, as is usual in ongoing opto-mechanical experiments [18], we shall be using SC microwave cavities. The reason for this is that the quality factor for SC microwave cavities has already been demonstrated by Haroche and co-workers [19] to be on the order of Q ∼ 10 10 (46) which can be much higher than that of typical optical cavities.…”
Section: The Dynamical Casimir Effect Via Parametric Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A versatile approach to manipulate mechanical states of motion is provided by the interaction with electromagnetic radiation, typically confined to microwave or optical cavities. Such cavity-optomechanics experiments [4][5][6][7][8] have thus far largely concentrated on high sensitivity continuous monitoring of the mechanical position [9][10][11][12][13][14]. Because of the back-action imparted by the probe onto the measured object, the precision of such a measurement is fundamentally constrained by the standard quantum limit (SQL) [15,16], and therefore only allows for classical phase-space reconstruction [9,17,18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also find that the bandwidth where optimal sensitivity is maintained is proportional to the cavity damping in the resolved sideband regime. Finally, the squeezing spectrum of the output signal is calculated, and it shows almost perfect squeezing at DC is possible by using a high quality factor and low thermal phonon-number mechanical oscillator.Dramatic progress in coupling mechanics to light [1][2][3][4] suggests that such devices may be used in a wide variety of settings to explore quantum effects in macroscopic systems. Furthermore, such systems can be exquisitely sensitive to small perturbations, such as forces induced either by acceleration as in accelerometer [5] or by, e.g., coupling to surfaces or fields as in atomic force microscopy [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%