1993
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/1993/t48/001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum phase and quantum phase operators: some physics and some history

Abstract: After reviewing the role of phase in quantum mechanics, I discuss, with the aid of a number of unpublished documents, the development of quantum phase operators in the 1960's. Interwoven in the discussion are the critical physics questions of the field: Are there (unique) quantum phase operators and are there quantum systems which can determine their nature? I conclude with a critique of recent proposals which have shed new light on the problem.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…introduced, as a matter of fact, by F London at the dawn of quantum mechanics [24], although their systematic use began only after the paper by Susskind and Glogower [25] (for the history see [26]). The commutator of E − and E + is the vacuum state projector,…”
Section: Quantum Counting Processes With Exponential Phase Operamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…introduced, as a matter of fact, by F London at the dawn of quantum mechanics [24], although their systematic use began only after the paper by Susskind and Glogower [25] (for the history see [26]). The commutator of E − and E + is the vacuum state projector,…”
Section: Quantum Counting Processes With Exponential Phase Operamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not the case and, in fact, no exact, well behaved Hermitean phase operator conjugate to the number is known to exist. [An article by Nieto [27] describes the early history of the phase operator question, and gives a feeling of the problematics of the field. An alternative discussion, primarily related to phases in the electromagnetic field, is available in [28]].…”
Section: Introduction and Preview Of The Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By this we mean to consider the phase of the order parameter as a quantum operator conjugate to particle number. In spite of the difficulties involving the definition of a hermitian phase operator [27], a semi-classical treatment is possible in Josephson nanosystems and the gap closing effect we have found may disappear due to such a contribution [23]. However, in a setup where superconductivity is induced via proximity effect, the simple description in terms of the Kitaev model may apply, and the new aspects we have discussed here is likely to be remain robust .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%