2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0375-9601(03)01175-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum prisoner dilemma under decoherence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
75
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
10
75
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These payoffs become the classical payoffs for δ = γ = 0 and for δ = γ = π 2 and µ = 0 these payoffs transform to the results given in the Ref [4]. It is known that decoherence has no effect on the Nash equilibrium of the game but it causes a reduction in the payoffs [3,4]. In our case it is interesting to note that this reduction of the payoffs depends on the degree of memory µ.…”
Section: Quantization In Presence Of Correlated Noisesupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These payoffs become the classical payoffs for δ = γ = 0 and for δ = γ = π 2 and µ = 0 these payoffs transform to the results given in the Ref [4]. It is known that decoherence has no effect on the Nash equilibrium of the game but it causes a reduction in the payoffs [3,4]. In our case it is interesting to note that this reduction of the payoffs depends on the degree of memory µ.…”
Section: Quantization In Presence Of Correlated Noisesupporting
confidence: 50%
“…This type of protocol was first applied to quantum games to show that above a certain level of decoherence the quantum player has no advantage over a classical player [2]. Later quantum version of Prisoners' Dilemma was analyzed in presence of decoherence to prove that Nash equilibrium is not affected by decoherence [3]. Recently, Flitney and Abbott [4] showed for the quantum games based on dephasing quantum channel that the advantage that a quantum player enjoys over a classical player diminishes as decoherence increases and vanishes for the maximum decoherence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of most of the previous quantum games are not robust against the noise [21] and the unique properties of various quantum games different from their clas- * Electronic address: stephenli74@yahoo.com.cn sical counterpart will disappear in the limit of decoherence [22,23]. However, Chen et al have discussed decoherence in quantum prisoners' dilemma [24], and found some kinds of decoherence have no effects on the Nash equilibria in the quantized prisoners' dilemma with maximally entangled states. Here, we present the simulation schemes of the quantized symmetric or asymmetric Cournot's Duopoly, in which there is not any entanglement involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is difficult for a maximally entangled quantum game to be realized in practice, for no quantum system can be completely isolated from its environment. System-environment interactions should induce decoherence of quantum systems [44][45][46]. The purpose of this paper is to look for the rule for the realization of cooperation in a general quantum game.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%