2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2005.03.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum simulations of realistic systems by auxiliary fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the only error in the method that cannot be eliminated systematically. The method has been applied to atoms, molecules, and simple solids, using a plane-wave basis and pseudopotentials, and has proved very successful [9,17,19].…”
Section: Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is the only error in the method that cannot be eliminated systematically. The method has been applied to atoms, molecules, and simple solids, using a plane-wave basis and pseudopotentials, and has proved very successful [9,17,19].…”
Section: Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the constraint, the calculated ground state energy is no longer exact and is not variational. In applications to several sp-bonded materials [9,17,18], it was shown that the method, with a plane-wave basis and simple trial wave functions, gave accurate results for systems from simple atoms to large supercells. The phaseless AF QMC method was also recently applied to the strongly correlated transition metal oxide molecules TiO and MnO [19], again yielding results in good agreement with experiment using simple mean-field trial wave functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), and it exhibits favorable O(M 3 -M 4 ) scaling. For ground states, the new AFQMC method has been applied to close to 100 systems, including first-and second-row molecules, 11,12,13 transition metal oxide molecules, 10 simple solids, 9,14 post-d elements, 15 van der Waals systems, 16 and in molecules in which bonds are being stretched or broken. 17,18 In these calculations we have operated largely in an automated mode, inputting only the DFT or Hartree-Fock (HF) solutions as trial wave functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QMC methods rely on the observation that deterministic evolution driven by the family of operators (3) can be mapped onto suitable stochastic processes and solved by randomly sampling appropriate probability distributions. Along with the typical approach in which (4) is associated to a diffusion process in the configurational space of the system [4,5,17], in a class of more recently developed QMC methods, the so-called determinantal [18][19][20][21][22] methods, (4) is mapped onto a stochastic process in the abstract manifold, which we will denote D(N ), of Nparticle Slater determinants.…”
Section: The Phaseless Afqmcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18,[20][21][22]24]. In the present work we consider one of such QMC methods, the phaseless Auxiliary Fields Quantum Monte Carlo (AFQMC) [20,22,25], which is considered less sensitive than FN to the quality of the trial function [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%