2007
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.75.022303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum simulations under translational symmetry

Abstract: We investigate the power of quantum systems for the simulation of Hamiltonian time evolutions on a cubic lattice under the constraint of translational invariance. Given a set of translationally invariant local Hamiltonians and short range interactions we determine time evolutions which can and those that can not be simulated. Whereas for general spin systems no finite universal set of generating interactions is shown to exist, universality turns out to be generic for quadratic bosonic and fermionic nearest-nei… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More precisely, the question whether (and to which extent) one quantum system can simulate another one can be answered by analysing the Lie-subalgebra structure of systems with a given dimension. Recently Kraus et al have explored whether target quantum systems can be universally simulated on translationally invariant lattices of bosonic, fermionic, and spin systems [17]. Based on the branching diagrams of simple subalgebras to su(N ), here we take a more general approach pursuing the question which type of quantum system can simulate a given one with least overhead in state-space dimension.…”
Section: Simulabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More precisely, the question whether (and to which extent) one quantum system can simulate another one can be answered by analysing the Lie-subalgebra structure of systems with a given dimension. Recently Kraus et al have explored whether target quantum systems can be universally simulated on translationally invariant lattices of bosonic, fermionic, and spin systems [17]. Based on the branching diagrams of simple subalgebras to su(N ), here we take a more general approach pursuing the question which type of quantum system can simulate a given one with least overhead in state-space dimension.…”
Section: Simulabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the p-th level of the system, f † p and f p change the occupation numbers n p labelling the respective states |n p such as to give f † p |0 = |1 = ( 1 0 ) = |↑ and f p |1 = |0 = ( 0 1 ) = |↓ , where by the Pauli principle n p ∈ {0, 1}, (f † p ) 2 ≡ 0, and (f p ) 2 ≡ 0. Now the properties of the usual quadratic Hamiltonians (see, e.g., [112,113,114,17,115])…”
Section: Fermionic Quantum Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An interesting question is what Hamiltonians can be simulated under certain control constraints. For example, (Kraus et al, 2007) discussed the class of Hamiltonians that can be simulated when one is restricted to applying translationally invariant Hamiltonians. The authors showed that if both local and nearest-neighbor interactions are controllable, then the simulation of interactions in quadratic fermionic and bosonic systems is possible.…”
Section: A Digital Quantum Simulation (Dqs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach is to avoid addressing individual atoms altogether. Kraus et al [71] explore the potential of simulations using only global single-particle and nearest neighbor interactions. This is a good approximation for atoms in optical lattices, and the three types of subsystem they considerfermions, bosons, and spins -can be realised by choosing different atoms to trap in the optical lattice and tuning the lattice parameters to different regimes.…”
Section: Atom Trap and Ion Trap Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%