1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6028(99)00510-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum-size effect in thin Al(110) slabs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
49
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This size dependence is in a general agreement with the experimental results [1] and self-consistent calculations for extended thin Al slabs [20] and cylindrical Al and Na wires [19,21]. However, there is a disagreement with the results of [15,16,17,18].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This size dependence is in a general agreement with the experimental results [1] and self-consistent calculations for extended thin Al slabs [20] and cylindrical Al and Na wires [19,21]. However, there is a disagreement with the results of [15,16,17,18].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…[14], the above approaches have been criticised. Detailed computations [15,16,17,18,19,20,21] (including ab initio calculations) performed to date do not yield an unequivocal conclusion about size dependence of the work function of isolated slabs and wires. In addition, amplitudes of the work function oscillations are larger than in experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the supported overlayer system, V ps ͑z͒ has two contributions, one from the Pb overlayer and the other from the Cu͑111͒ substrate. The free electronlike character of Pb at the Fermi level justifies the use of the stabilized jellium or averaged pseudopotential 27,45,46 approach to model Pb. In practice, the jellium model allows us to simulate any Pb overlayer thickness.…”
Section: A Construction Of the Pseudopotentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First-principles atomistic approaches [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] or jellium models [32][33][34][35][36] have been used. Usually, because of the high computational demand, the substrate is not included, and the electronic structure is calculated for a slab describing the overlayer only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of this shell structure on the physical properties was recognized already in early jellium slab calculations 7 and the stability as a function of the thickness was discussed on the basis of density-functional-theory ͑DFT͒ calculations already two decades ago. 8 Later jellium and pseudopotential calculations [9][10][11][12][13] have dealt with quantum size effects in unsupported metallic slabs. For example, the pseudopotential-slab calculation by Materzanini et al 12 enlightened the origin of the double ML periodicity in apparent heights, and they discussed also the importance of the strain induced by the Cu substrate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%