1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.57.10291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum tunneling and classical barrier reduction for a mesoscopic spin

Abstract: I show that for a large spin with uniaxial anisotropy it is, in principle, impossible to distinguish classical energy-barrier reduction due to a transverse magnetic field from an increase in the tunneling rate of excited levels. Given a suitable definition of the quantum energy barrier, I derive an expression for the field dependence of the barrier height that agrees with the classical result up to a constant of order unity. Numerical results show that for a mesoscopic spin (Sϳ10) the barrier decreases in a se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From these and similar data we deduce the Þeld dependence of T B , as summarized in Fig. 2 26 The solid line in Fig. 2 is a Þt of the measured T B to the predicted quadratic dependence on Þeld.…”
Section: B Measurement Of the Equilibrium Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 55%
“…From these and similar data we deduce the Þeld dependence of T B , as summarized in Fig. 2 26 The solid line in Fig. 2 is a Þt of the measured T B to the predicted quadratic dependence on Þeld.…”
Section: B Measurement Of the Equilibrium Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In addition, B x provides a symmetry-breaking term that increases the tunneling rate. 20,21 We note that the deviations shown in Fig. 7 are especially pronounced at high values of U / T max .…”
Section: Comparison With Theory and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…2b contains a horizontal dotted line -an empirically determined "tunnel threshold". When the tunnel splitting for a particular pair of levels approaches this threshold, tunneling for that pair begins to become the dominant relaxation mechanism [33,34,36,37]. For example, at H T ∼ 4.2 kOe (marked by the red vertical dotted line), the tunnel splitting for m = ±3 reaches the threshold and tunneling between these levels begins to dominate over relaxation through higher levels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%