2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41566-019-0509-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum wave–particle superposition in a delayed-choice experiment

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theory here not only has been proved by the current experiments, e.g., Refs. [28,29], but also gives the more direct theoretical explanations to the current experiments, e.g., Refs. [28,29].…”
Section: Discussion Summary and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The theory here not only has been proved by the current experiments, e.g., Refs. [28,29], but also gives the more direct theoretical explanations to the current experiments, e.g., Refs. [28,29].…”
Section: Discussion Summary and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In Fig. 1 c, we adopt a modified version of the quantum-controlled delayed-choice experiment, recently proposed by Ionicioiu and Terno 42 and implemented in several double-path experiments 12 15 . By introducing a quantum-controlled BS that is in a coherent superposition of presence and absence, it represents a controllable experiment platform that can reveal wave or particle character, and their intermediate character 42 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observation of 2-path wave-particle transition is consistent with the results in refs. 13 15 . In contrast, in the d -path experiments (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For simplicity, or are usually denoted as and , which are states of the QBS’s position degree of freedom (DOF). Such a configuration leads to a quantum superposition of particle-state and wave-state [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Surprisingly, the interference between these two states violates the relation in Equation ( 1 ) [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%