2019
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphys.6.6.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quark-gluon tagging: Machine learning vs detector

Abstract: Distinguishing quarks from gluons based on low-level detector output is one of the most challenging applications of multi-variate and machine learning techniques at the LHC. We first show the performance of our 4-vector-based LoLa tagger without and after considering detector effects. We then discuss two benchmark applications, mono-jet searches with a gluon-rich signal and di-jet resonances with a quark-rich signal. In both cases an immediate benefit compared to the standard event-level analysis exists.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevailing choice is a sequence, where particles are sorted in a specific way (e.g., with decreasing transverse momentum) and organized into a 1D list. Using particle sequences as inputs, jet tagging tasks have been tackled with recurrent neural networks (RNNs) [36][37][38][39]44], 1D CNNs [40][41][42][43] and physics-oriented neural networks [45][46][47]. Another interesting choice is a binary tree, which is well motivated from the QCD theory perspective.…”
Section: Particle-based Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prevailing choice is a sequence, where particles are sorted in a specific way (e.g., with decreasing transverse momentum) and organized into a 1D list. Using particle sequences as inputs, jet tagging tasks have been tackled with recurrent neural networks (RNNs) [36][37][38][39]44], 1D CNNs [40][41][42][43] and physics-oriented neural networks [45][46][47]. Another interesting choice is a binary tree, which is well motivated from the QCD theory perspective.…”
Section: Particle-based Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, machine learning (ML) has injected fresh blood in jet tagging. Jets are regarded as images [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], as sequences [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47], trees [48,49] or graphs [50] of particles, and ML techniques, most notably, deep neural networks (DNNs), are used to build new jet tagging algorithms automatically from (labelled) simulated samples or even (unlabelled) real data [51][52][53][54], leading to new insights and improvements in jet tagging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The jet substructure manifests color, electric charge, flavor, etc. of the jet ancestral partons and hence is useful in discriminating, e.g., quark/gluon jets [25,26,[26][27][28][29][30]. The jet superstructure is usually formulated if the jet ancestral partons share the same parent particle, where they tend to be showered in a correlated way [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this problem, a large number of architectures based on fully connected neural networks [1,2], image-based methods [3,4], recursive clustering [5,6], physics variables [7][8][9][10], sets [11], and graphs [12,13] have been studied [14][15][16]. Related challenges of identifying vector bosons [17,18], b-quarks [19,20], and Higgs bosons [13,21] and of distinguishing light quark from gluon jets [22][23][24][25] have seen similar progress. Beyond classifying single particles in an event, there is also work on developing holistic methods that classify full events according to the likely physics process that produced them [26,27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%