2014
DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2014)097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quark masses in Higgs production with a jet veto

Abstract: Abstract:We study the impact of finite mass effects due to top and bottom loops in the jet-veto distribution for Higgs production. We discuss the appearance of non-factorizing logarithms in the region p t,veto m b . We study their numerical impact and argue that these terms can be treated as a finite remainder. We therefore detail our prescription for resumming the jet-vetoed cross section and for assessing its uncertainty in the presence of finite mass effects. Resummation for the jet-veto, including mass eff… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
95
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fixed order perturbation theory supplemented with resummation of these jet veto logarithms is a powerful tool to make predictions of exclusive jet cross sections and the associated uncertainties. Recent work in this vein has substantially lowered the H → W W * 0-jet and 1-jet uncertainties [6,[8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fixed order perturbation theory supplemented with resummation of these jet veto logarithms is a powerful tool to make predictions of exclusive jet cross sections and the associated uncertainties. Recent work in this vein has substantially lowered the H → W W * 0-jet and 1-jet uncertainties [6,[8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exclusive jet cross sections, such as the H + 0-jet cross section in which there are no jets with p T > p cut T , play a key role in channels where the Higgs cannot be reconstructed and jet binning is an effective discriminant between various Standard Model backgrounds. The uncertainty in theoretical predictions of these exclusive jet cross sections can be substantial, and accurately predicting these cross sections and providing robust estimates of their uncertainty is the focus of considerable effort [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. A good example is the H → W W * → + − νν channel, where a fixed order analysis of the exclusive 0-jet and 1-jet cross sections have theoretical uncertainties of O(17%) and O(30%) respectively and dominate the systematic uncertainties in the measurement [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core element of our estimate of uncertainty in the jet-vetoed cross section is the JVE method [23]. The premise of the method is that the zero-jet cross section is given by the product of the total cross section and jet-veto efficiency and that the uncertainties in -2 -…”
Section: Updated Jet-veto Efficiency Methods At Fixed Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of top quark effects on the leading jet's transverse momentum at NLO has been studied through a 1/m t expansion [20]. Different prescriptions have been proposed to include top and bottom effects in analytic resummations [21][22][23] as well as parton-shower simulations, e.g. in (N)NLO+PS generators [24][25][26].…”
Section: Jhep04(2016)049mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very high logarithmic accuracy (N 3 LL) was achieved using Soft Collinear Effective Theory (SCET) for particular event shapes in e + e − collisions [51,52]. Inter-jet radiation and in particular its response to the presence of a jet veto has also received a lot of attention both from the theoretical [53][54][55][56][57][58][59] and experimental [60][61][62][63] communities, primarily in the context of Higgs-boson studies [64][65][66][67][68][69][70]. All-order analytical calculations have been performed recently for an increasing number of jet-substructure observables, including jet masses [71][72][73][74], other jet shapes [75][76][77][78][79], sub-jet multiplicity [80] and grooming algorithms [81][82][83].…”
Section: Jhep02(2015)106mentioning
confidence: 99%