1983
DOI: 10.1016/0370-1573(83)90043-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quark mixing in weak interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
90
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 463 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 234 publications
5
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 are dominant. This is an interesting empirical support for the general rule that the diagrams of external emission are color favored and dominate the processes [61].…”
Section: Dk Scattering Amplitudesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…1 are dominant. This is an interesting empirical support for the general rule that the diagrams of external emission are color favored and dominate the processes [61].…”
Section: Dk Scattering Amplitudesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In the diagrammatic approach, all two-body nonleptonic weak decays of heavy mesons can be expressed in terms of six distinct quark diagrams [42,43,44]: T , the color-allowed external Wemission tree diagram; C, the color-suppressed internal W -emission diagram; E, the W -exchange diagram; A, the W -annihilation diagram; P, the penguin diagram; and V, the vertical W -loop diagram. It should be stressed that these quark diagrams are classified according to the topologies of weak interactions with all strong interaction effects included and hence they are not Feynman graphs.…”
Section: Final-state Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without making any assumptions regarding the sizes of these contributions, we find out their upper and lower limits. Another useful method to study various hadronic decays of the B and D mesons is the topological diagram approach [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. We have used this approach in conjunction with the isospin symmetry to derive a simple expression relating all the branching ratios and CP asymmetries under consideration.…”
Section: Jhep11(2017)087mentioning
confidence: 99%