2019
DOI: 10.1111/sed.12620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quartz and zircon decoupling in sandstone: Petrography and quartz cathodoluminescence of the Early Triassic continental Buntsandstein Group in Germany

Abstract: This study illustrates how decoupling of quartz and zircon can be used advantageously in provenance research. Thirty-eight fine-grained to coarsegrained arkose samples of the Early Triassic intracontinental Buntsandstein Group from the Central European Basin in Germany were analysed for their petrography and 1200 grains in 23 of these for their detrital quartz cathodoluminescence characteristics. The samples represent the Hessian and Thuringian sub-basins and the Eichsfeld-Altmark Swell separating them. The He… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is no systematic offset between these bulk grain size values and sample median values. This is counter to theoretical and experimental findings from other studies that predict or observe ~0.20–0.46 mm offset between mean bulk sample and zircon grain size for the range of bulk grain sizes considered here, and zircon grains in these studies are uniformly smaller than bulk grain size (Augustsson et al, 2019; Garzanti et al, 2008; Resentini et al, 2013). Note that although median values are used in this study, the offset between mean and median grain dimension are <0.011 mm (long axis) and <0.007 mm (short axis) for all samples presented here.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no systematic offset between these bulk grain size values and sample median values. This is counter to theoretical and experimental findings from other studies that predict or observe ~0.20–0.46 mm offset between mean bulk sample and zircon grain size for the range of bulk grain sizes considered here, and zircon grains in these studies are uniformly smaller than bulk grain size (Augustsson et al, 2019; Garzanti et al, 2008; Resentini et al, 2013). Note that although median values are used in this study, the offset between mean and median grain dimension are <0.011 mm (long axis) and <0.007 mm (short axis) for all samples presented here.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Less than 40 samples (minor proportions in Götze [32], Mørk [33], von Eynatten and Gaupp [34], De Ros et al [35], Lippmann [36], Olivarius et al [37]) that are formally silt or conglomerates were included; they are mentioned in the text only when it is relevant for the discussion. The data include a sequence from the Permian to Palaeogene of Northern Europe (from Germany in the south to the Barents Sea in the north) with a transition from Permo-Triassic tectonically passive to rift-dominated continental and Jurassic to Cretaceous marine rift basins, to Palaeogene passive-margin marine environments [20,32,33,[36][37][38][39][40]. They also include coastal Cambrian passive-margin sandstone from Scandinavian Baltica [41][42][43], Silurian-Devonian intracratonic basin sandstone from the Paraná Basin in Brazil [35], Cretaceous Alpine deposits [34,44], rift-related Iberian Cretaceous to Pyrenean Palaeogene continental to marine deposits [45,46], and recent intracontinental sand from central Spain [47].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lorentzen et al [42,43] and Ärlebrand [40] used the Gazzi-Dickinson method but applied a 30 µm and 20 µm matrix cut-off, respectively. von Eynatten and Gaupp [34] and Augustsson et al [20] used a modified Gazzi-Dickinson method with all rock fragments counted as such. Caja Rodríguez [45] is the only study specifying the use of the Indiana method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2A). The Franconian Basin is east-bounded by the BM, the most significant exposure of Variscan basement rocks in Central Europe and considered the primary sediment source of the SE-CEBS (Schr€ oder et al, 1997;Dill & Klosa, 2011;Augustsson et al, 2018Augustsson et al, , 2019. Two tectonostratigraphic domains are recognized along the western BM: (i) the Moldanubian terrain (SE BM) (Fig.…”
Section: Tectonic Climate and Sediment Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%