1991
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/249.4.577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasar H  profiles and discs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The timescale to change the geometry of these systems (r out /r in and/or inclination) is much longer than the observed timescale of line profile variability, disfavoring geometrical changes as the cause of the observed variability. The line profile variability of these objects is uncorrelated with variability of the observed continuum flux of the source, in contradiction with predictions by Jackson et al (1991). Another issue with the third suggested explanation is that single-peaked lines are very difficult to produce in this scenario, which would lead to a higher fraction of double-peaked emitters than observed in the AGN population.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The timescale to change the geometry of these systems (r out /r in and/or inclination) is much longer than the observed timescale of line profile variability, disfavoring geometrical changes as the cause of the observed variability. The line profile variability of these objects is uncorrelated with variability of the observed continuum flux of the source, in contradiction with predictions by Jackson et al (1991). Another issue with the third suggested explanation is that single-peaked lines are very difficult to produce in this scenario, which would lead to a higher fraction of double-peaked emitters than observed in the AGN population.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…A few explanations for the rare occurrence of DPEL have been suggested in the context of the scenario of line production in the accretion disk: (1) geometrical reasons: large r out /r in (Dumont & Collin-Souffrin 1990) and/or small inclination (Corbin 1997), (2) radiative transfer effects through a disk wind (Chiang & Murray 1996;Murray & Chiang 1997, hereafter CM96 and MC97, respectively), (3) the geometry of the ionizing source and the scattering medium (Jackson et al 1991), and (4) an additional BLR zone outside of the disk (Popović et al 2004;Bon et al 2009). A more detailed summary and discussion of these ideas can be found in Eracleous & Halpern (2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of asking why a few percent of AGNs show double-peaked emission lines, we ask why most AGNs do not show double-peaked emission lines, since virtually all AGNs must have accretion disks. Possible reasons include: i) a vertical extended ionizing structure is required for double-peaked emitters , so if there is no illuminating source shining on the disk, the double-peaked lines will either disappear or be weak and buried on the continuum, or ii) if the disk extends to large radius (Rokaki et al 1992;Jackson et al 1991), iii) the disk is face-on or iv) there is a disk wind (Murray & Chiang 1997;Eracleous et al 2004). Any of the above could smear out the double-peaked profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The line-emitting disk in most AGNs could be quite large with a ratio of outer to inner radius of order 10 or more. This would bring the two peaks of a double-peaked line close together and make the profiles appear single-peaked (Dumont & Collin-Souffrin 1990a;Jackson, Penston, & Pérez 1991).…”
Section: Connection Of Double-peaked Emitters With Thementioning
confidence: 99%