2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasars at intermediate redshift are not special; but they are often satellites

Abstract: Understanding the links between the activity of supermassive black holes (SMBH) at the centres of galaxies and their host dark matter haloes is a key question in modern astrophysics. The final data release of the SDSS-IV eBOSS provides the largest contemporary spectroscopic sample of galaxies and QSOs. Using this sample and covering the redshift interval z = 0.7 − 1.1, we have measured the clustering properties of the eBOSS QSOs, Emission Line Galaxies (ELGs) and Luminous Red Galaxies (LRGs). We have also meas… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(149 reference statements)
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that there is no evidence of any significant difference between the neighbors of AGN host galaxies and those of the mass-and redshift-matched sample of inactive galaxies, in terms of morphology, current SFRs, SFH indicators, and age. This suggests that AGN host galaxies will also have very similar properties to those of inactive galaxies (in agreement with studies quasar host at intermediate redshifts by Alam et al 2021); similarly that the AGN activity also has little influence on the properties of its neighbors, although this may occur in environments where the intergalactic medium is denser (Dressler 1980). Figure 9 shows this particularly well, where we find that the sSFR of the neighbors of the AGN hosts does not depend on distance from the galaxy and follows the same distribution as for neighbors of inactive galaxies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…We find that there is no evidence of any significant difference between the neighbors of AGN host galaxies and those of the mass-and redshift-matched sample of inactive galaxies, in terms of morphology, current SFRs, SFH indicators, and age. This suggests that AGN host galaxies will also have very similar properties to those of inactive galaxies (in agreement with studies quasar host at intermediate redshifts by Alam et al 2021); similarly that the AGN activity also has little influence on the properties of its neighbors, although this may occur in environments where the intergalactic medium is denser (Dressler 1980). Figure 9 shows this particularly well, where we find that the sSFR of the neighbors of the AGN hosts does not depend on distance from the galaxy and follows the same distribution as for neighbors of inactive galaxies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is our first main finding -while majority of radio galaxies are the central galaxies in their respective halos consistent with previous results, 20% of radio galaxies in S are in satellite galaxies. This fraction is consistent with recent observations suggesting a nontrivial minority of bright AGN are hosted by satellites (Alam et al 2021;Aird & Coil 2021).…”
Section: Satellite Fractionssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is our first main finding -while majority of radio galaxies are the central galaxies in their respective haloes as canonically believed, 20 per cent of radio galaxies in SIMBA are in satellite galaxies. This fraction is consistent with recent observations suggesting a non-trivial minority of bright AGNs are hosted by satellites (Aird & Coil 2021 ;Alam et al 2021 ). It is worth noting that a large fraction of these satellites have stellar masses comparable to that of their corresponding central, with only 162/278 satellites having masses less that half times the mass of their central and only 77/278 with less than 0.25 times the mass of the central.…”
Section: Satellite Fractionssupporting
confidence: 90%