2006
DOI: 10.21236/ada450906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-2D Unsteady Flow Procedure for Real Fluids (PREPRINT)

Abstract: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Info… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For vibration directions that correspond to a drill extending as it unwinds, (an axial-torsional mode) the chatter response frequency is found to be lower than the natural frequency of the oscillation, a result confirmed in experiment [3]. We have not considered nonlinear stability results in this paper, it is a calculation that would require projection on a center manifold for the infinite-dimensional delay differential equation [6], we take up this question in another paper [7]. Suffice to say that we expect it to be different for the two models, as the nonlinear results were different for the non-regenerative case, due to the difference in the coefficient on theη 2 terms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For vibration directions that correspond to a drill extending as it unwinds, (an axial-torsional mode) the chatter response frequency is found to be lower than the natural frequency of the oscillation, a result confirmed in experiment [3]. We have not considered nonlinear stability results in this paper, it is a calculation that would require projection on a center manifold for the infinite-dimensional delay differential equation [6], we take up this question in another paper [7]. Suffice to say that we expect it to be different for the two models, as the nonlinear results were different for the non-regenerative case, due to the difference in the coefficient on theη 2 terms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%