2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00039-017-0408-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-classical asymptotics for functions of Wiener–Hopf operators: smooth versus non-smooth symbols

Abstract: Abstract. We consider functions of Wiener-Hopf type operators on the Hilbert space L 2 (R d ). It has been known for a long time that the quasi-classical asymptotics for traces of resulting operators strongly depend on the smoothness of the symbol: for smooth symbols the expansion is power-like, whereas discontinuous symbols (e.g. indicator functions) produce an extra logarithmic factor. We investigate the transition regime by studying symbols depending on an extra parameter T ≥ 0 in such a way that the symbol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The double asymptotics of the EE and of its coefficient B d are not simple to analyze and hard to guess by heuristic arguments. For low temperatures, that is small T > 0, this analysis has been performed in [17] for d = 1 and in [24] for d ≥ 2 yielding a result consistent with that for T = 0 in [12,15].…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…The double asymptotics of the EE and of its coefficient B d are not simple to analyze and hard to guess by heuristic arguments. For low temperatures, that is small T > 0, this analysis has been performed in [17] for d = 1 and in [24] for d ≥ 2 yielding a result consistent with that for T = 0 in [12,15].…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…The obtained asymptotic formula described the behaviour of the trace of (1.1) as the two parameters, α and T , independently tended to their respective limits: α → ∞ and T → 0. On the other hand, the results of [15] did not cover the case α → ∞, T = const. One aim of the current paper is to bridge this gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In this case the asymptotics for the operator (1.1) have a form different from (1.2), and their proof requires different methods. (4) In [15] the transition between the smooth and discontinuous symbol was studied: the smooth symbol a was supposed to depend on an extra "smoothing" parameter T > 0 so that a = a T converged to an indicator function as T → 0. The obtained asymptotic formula described the behaviour of the trace of (1.1) as the two parameters, α and T , independently tended to their respective limits: α → ∞ and T → 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multidimensional generalization of this result, even with more general discontinuous symbols a was obtained in [23], [24]. Further extension to non-smooth functions h was done in [18], [26], [27]. The formula (1.1) is a continuous analogue of the second-order Szegő limit theorem, see [30], so we loosely refer to (1.1) and (1.2) as Szegő formulas, or formulas of Szegő type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%