International Encyclopedia of the Social &Amp; Behavioral Sciences 2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.10504-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-Experimental Designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The participants of this study were first-year university students in the class of 2019. A quasi-experimental design was adopted in this study as the participants were not randomly assigned (Hallberg & Eno, 2015). Participants were grouped according to their scheduled classes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants of this study were first-year university students in the class of 2019. A quasi-experimental design was adopted in this study as the participants were not randomly assigned (Hallberg & Eno, 2015). Participants were grouped according to their scheduled classes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quasiexperimental design, by contrast, compares two natural groups without random allocation of participants. Thereby, only limited causal conclusions are possible [31,32]. Our samples did not originate from the same population and demographics were not equivalent.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control groups live their lives as usual, where there is no question of any kind of intervention. In this way, the relationship between the intervention group and the controls can be described as a natural experiment or a quasi-experiment [37,38].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we did check that the outcome variables, age, gender and diagnosis were very similar and that the difference lay in how often they had activities outside the home. Considering that we did not use randomization, we instead chose a method that can be described as a natural experiment or a quasi-experiment [37,38]. Although this could be a limitation, by choosing this option we gain ethically, as well as by research from having followed the groups in a natural way instead of in a randomized controlled trial.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%