2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2008.03741.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-geostrophic flows responsible for the secular variation of the Earth's magnetic field

Abstract: International audienceWe present core flows constructed from high resolution secular variation (SV) models for the epochs 2001, 2002.5 and 2004, assuming that these flows are quasi-geostrophic in the core interior and that they do not cross the axial cylindrical surface tangent to the inner core. A large jet encircling the inner core and carrying a significant part of the core angular momentum and axial vortices of ∼700 km diameter mainly clustering around the cylinder tangent to the solid inner core, are infe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

28
230
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
28
230
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar equatorially-symmetric westwards flow close to the tangent cylinder has been identified in previous direct core-flow inversions e.g. [22,23], and is sometimes interpreted as an integral part of a planetary-scale gyre. …”
Section: Observationally-constrained High-latitude Flowmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…A similar equatorially-symmetric westwards flow close to the tangent cylinder has been identified in previous direct core-flow inversions e.g. [22,23], and is sometimes interpreted as an integral part of a planetary-scale gyre. …”
Section: Observationally-constrained High-latitude Flowmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…k l n denotes the nth zero of the degree l − 1 spherical Bessel function, and in this particular calculation we let n = l. Recent studies have estimated flow models fitting SV models either at one standard deviation [Pais and Jault, 2008] or even more tightly [Holme and Olsen, 2006;Olsen and Mandea, 2008;Wardinski et al, 2008]. Here, we do not restrict ourselves to either of these cases, but study resulting models by varying the misfit level within one standard deviation.…”
Section: Core Flow Inversion With the Tm Constraint In The Spherical mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, a flow model estimated without accounting for this SV contribution can be affected by the aliasing. The SV misfit may even have to be no smaller than those of flow models based on magnetic models built with ground-based observation alone [Pais and Jault, 2008].…”
Section: Core Flow Inversion With the Tm Constraint In The Spherical mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations