2019
DOI: 10.1214/18-aihp931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-independence for nodal lines

Abstract: We prove a quasi-independence result for level sets of a planar centered stationary Gaussian field with covariance (x, y) → κ(x − y), with only mild conditions on the regularity of κ. As a first application, we study percolation for nodal lines in the spirit of [BG16]. In the said article, Beffara and Gayet rely on Tassion's method ([Tas16]) to prove that, under some assumptions on κ, most notably that κ ≥ 0 and κ(x) = O(|x| −325 ), the nodal set satisfies a box-crossing property. The decay exponent was then l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, whereas the previous best known sufficient condition for quasi-independence was polynomial decay with exponent β > 4 [ RV19b], we deduce asymptotic independence as long as correlations decay (roughly speaking) polynomially with exponent β > 2. More precisely (in the case r = R 1 = R 2 = R), [RV19b] roughly implies that (4.2) holds for crossing events with the right-hand-side replaced by cR −β × (Total influence) 2 where the term 'Total influence' is the sum of R 2 influences defined in the spirit of the influences from Section 2.2.…”
Section: Quasi-independence and Rsw Estimatescontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, whereas the previous best known sufficient condition for quasi-independence was polynomial decay with exponent β > 4 [ RV19b], we deduce asymptotic independence as long as correlations decay (roughly speaking) polynomially with exponent β > 2. More precisely (in the case r = R 1 = R 2 = R), [RV19b] roughly implies that (4.2) holds for crossing events with the right-hand-side replaced by cR −β × (Total influence) 2 where the term 'Total influence' is the sum of R 2 influences defined in the spirit of the influences from Section 2.2.…”
Section: Quasi-independence and Rsw Estimatescontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Remark 1.12. The first statement of Theorem 1.11 gives analogues of the RSW estimates in critical percolation theory (see for instance [Gri99,BR06]), which have previously been established under stronger conditions on the decay of correlations (roughly corresponding to β > 4) [BG17,BM18,RV19b]. The statement about Arm 0 (r, R) is the analogue of the one-arm decay in percolation theory, and follows in a straightforward way from the RSW estimates (at least, if a preliminary 'quasi-independence' property has been established; see Theorem 4.2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For any set T, we say that an event Adouble-struckRT is increasing if for any xA{ydouble-struckRT|tT,yfalse(tfalse)xfalse(tfalse)}A.The following result is essentially due to Loren Pitt and says that Gaussian vectors with non‐negative covariance satisfy the FKG inequality. Loren Pitt stated it for finite‐dimensional Gaussian vectors but the general case follows easily (see for instance [, Theorem A.4]). Lemma Let false(Xtfalse)tT be an a.s. continuous Gaussian random field on a separable topological space T with covariance Σ=(σij)ij.…”
Section: The Lower Bound In the Critical Casementioning
confidence: 99%