1992
DOI: 10.1109/63.136248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-linear modeling and control of DC-DC converters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof of Theorem 2. To prove the optimality property in (14), consider any solution ξ = (x, u) to H. Then for each (t, j) ∈ dom x and denoting t = t j+1 to simplify notation, we have from (18) V (x(t, j)) − V (x(0, 0))…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Proof of Theorem 2. To prove the optimality property in (14), consider any solution ξ = (x, u) to H. Then for each (t, j) ∈ dom x and denoting t = t j+1 to simplify notation, we have from (18) V (x(t, j)) − V (x(0, 0))…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 3: It should be emphasized that once matrices P and Q i ∈ R n×n , i ∈ K have been fixed compliantly with requirement (13), the guaranteed performance level for our scheme (in terms of size of the upper bound for index J in (12) along solutions) is proportional to the inverse of η ∈ (0, 1) (see (14)). To this end, large values of η (as close as possible to 1) are expected to lead to improved LQ performance along solutions.…”
Section: Hybrid Model and Proposed Control Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations