2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2005.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-Monte Carlo quadratures for multivariate smooth functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the reduced basis is less sensitive to the smoothness of the functions than the usual tensor product Chebyshev interpolation. This has been already observed in [1] and as our basis is also a lot less sensitive to the dimensional effect, we only keep it for higher dimensions. Table 4 Numerical approximation sparse basis Q = 4.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This means that the reduced basis is less sensitive to the smoothness of the functions than the usual tensor product Chebyshev interpolation. This has been already observed in [1] and as our basis is also a lot less sensitive to the dimensional effect, we only keep it for higher dimensions. Table 4 Numerical approximation sparse basis Q = 4.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…γ (1) k,j = −s l 1 (k),l 1 (j) s l 3 (k),l 3 (j) (−1) l 2 (k)+l 2 (j)+1 l 2 (j) 2 + l 2 (k) 2 , γ (2) k,j = s l 1 (k),l 1 (j) s l 3 (k),l 3 (j) l 2 (j) 2 + l 2 (k) 2 , γ (3) k,j = s l 2 (k),l 2 (j) s l 3 (k),l 3 (j) l 1 (j) 2 + l 1 (k) 2 , γ (4) k,j = −s l 2 (k),l 2 (j) s l 3 (k),l 3 (j) (−1) l 1 (k)+l 1 (j)+1 l 1 (j) 2 + l 1 (k) 2 , γ (5) k,j = s l 1 (k),l 1 (j) s l 2 (k),l 2 (j) l 3 (j) 2 + l 3 (k) 2 , γ (6) k,j = −s l 1 (k),l 1 (j) s l 2 (k),l 2 (j) (−1) l 3 (k)+l 3 (j)+1 l 3 (j) 2 + l 3 (k) 2 and finally…”
Section: The Tridimensional Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations