2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-neutral evolution in populations under small demographic fluctuations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models of cell cycle dynamics find that selection favors cell types that periodically arrest their cell cycle (thus reducing per-capita turnover rate) relative to non-arresting cells even when their growth rates are equal (Wodarz et al, 2017). Similarly, ecological models find that when species with equal growth rates compete in finite, fluctuating populations, the species with a lower death rate outcompetes the one with a higher death rate despite the infinite population limit predicting coexistence (Lin et al, 2012; Oliveira and Dickman, 2017; Balasekaran et al, 2022). This latter bias towards species with lower death rates has sometimes been interpreted as a selection for ‘longevity’ (Lin et al, 2012) or a ‘slower biological clock’ (Oliveira and Dickman, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models of cell cycle dynamics find that selection favors cell types that periodically arrest their cell cycle (thus reducing per-capita turnover rate) relative to non-arresting cells even when their growth rates are equal (Wodarz et al, 2017). Similarly, ecological models find that when species with equal growth rates compete in finite, fluctuating populations, the species with a lower death rate outcompetes the one with a higher death rate despite the infinite population limit predicting coexistence (Lin et al, 2012; Oliveira and Dickman, 2017; Balasekaran et al, 2022). This latter bias towards species with lower death rates has sometimes been interpreted as a selection for ‘longevity’ (Lin et al, 2012) or a ‘slower biological clock’ (Oliveira and Dickman, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%