2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-static crush behavior of aluminum honeycomb specimens under compression dominant combined loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this region the crushing and fracture of the cores start ( Figure 5). Depending on the core densification at the end of Region 3, an increase in the compressive stress is observed, as was reported in [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] .…”
Section: Modeling Of the Cell Walls Of Honeycomb Compositessupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this region the crushing and fracture of the cores start ( Figure 5). Depending on the core densification at the end of Region 3, an increase in the compressive stress is observed, as was reported in [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] .…”
Section: Modeling Of the Cell Walls Of Honeycomb Compositessupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Zhou and Mayer 20 studied the shear, tearing, and compression tests over honeycomb aluminum, which showed different failure modes involved in a general crash accident. Mohr and Doyoyo, 21,22 Hong et al 23 performed multi-axial loading tests of honeycomb materials and derived the macroscopic yield functions for the honeycomb materials. Wilbert et al 24 proved that following an initial linear response, the cell walls buckle elastically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the honeycomb specimens employed by the above-mentioned researchers [2,12,13] have only single in-plane orientation angle and thus the shear loads were applied along single direction. Hong et al [6,7] devised two systems (so-called the independently controlled test fixture [6] and the inclined test fixture [7]) to extensively investigated the quasi-static crush behavior of aluminum honeycomb under combined shear-compression. A phenomenological yield criterion for aluminum honeycomb specimens with different in-plane orientation angles was proposed in terms of the experimental normal crush and shear strengths under different loading conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The true stress-strain curves of these high-density honeycomb structures exhibit no initial collapse or peak stress, typically observed at thin-walled hexagonal honeycombs [13][14] or square honeycombs [7][8] made by aluminum sheets in terms of a corrugation/stacking process and extruded maraging steel based on the DRM (Direct Reduction Method) LCA technology, respectively. After exceeding the offset yield strength, the present specimens show a stress increase due to strain hardening of the cell wall material, followed by a maximum compression stress and finally a strength decrease, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Stress-strain Behavior At Quasi-static and Dynamic Compressimentioning
confidence: 99%