2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10704-018-0277-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-static fracturing in double-flawed specimens under uniaxial loading: the role of strain rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crack initiation modes observed in the present experiments support this speculation. After the first crack initiation, the stress in specimen redistributes . Secondary stress distribution is controlled by geometric characteristics of both initiated macrocracks (tensile cracks) and preexisting flaws.…”
Section: Fracture Mechanism Of Sandstone With Non‐isometric Flawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The crack initiation modes observed in the present experiments support this speculation. After the first crack initiation, the stress in specimen redistributes . Secondary stress distribution is controlled by geometric characteristics of both initiated macrocracks (tensile cracks) and preexisting flaws.…”
Section: Fracture Mechanism Of Sandstone With Non‐isometric Flawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of fundamental significance to investigate the effects of preexisting flaws on mechanical and cracking behaviours of brittle rocks. Up to date, many experimental and theoretical studies were carried out to investigate mechanical and cracking behaviours in brittle flawed rocks or rock‐like specimens under uniaxial compression. For example, a comparative experimental study on the crack initiation, growth, and coalescence behaviours in gypsum specimens respectively containing open and closed flaws was conducted by Park and Bobet .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Numerical methods can be classified into two categories: continuum‐based methods and discontinuum‐based methods. In terms of the continuum‐based methods, finite element method (FEM), finite difference method (FDM), boundary element method (BEM), extended finite element method (XFEM), phantom node method, strain softening elements, and specific meshfree methods, such as bond particle method (BPM), peridynamics (PD), smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH), and general particle dynamics (GPD), were developed to investigate interlayers and crack problems. In terms of the discontinuum‐based methods, distinct lattice spring model (DLSM), discrete element method (DEM), discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA), and numerical manifold method (NMM) were developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%