2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40315-014-0062-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasiconformal Embeddings of Y-Pieces

Abstract: In this paper we construct quasiconformal embeddings from Y-pieces that contain a short boundary geodesic into degenerate ones. These results are used in a companion paper to study the Jacobian tori of Riemann surfaces that contain small simple closed geodesics. (2010): 30F30, 30F45 and 30F60. Mathematics Subject Classifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this section are presented in [3]. We summarize them for convenience and slightly extend them for the present needs.…”
Section: Mappings Of Y-piecesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of this section are presented in [3]. We summarize them for convenience and slightly extend them for the present needs.…”
Section: Mappings Of Y-piecesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In particular, the boundary geodesic γ 3 of length goes to the horocycle hˆ of lengthˆ , where asymptoticallyˆ ∼ 2 π , as → 0. With φ thus extended we have the following variant of Theorem 5.1 in [3]:…”
Section: Mappings Of Y-piecesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this subsection are presented in [BMMS14]. We summarize them for convenience and slightly extend them for the present needs.…”
Section: Mappings Of Y-piecesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In particular, the boundary geodesic γ 3 of length ǫ goes to the horocycle h ǫ of length ǫ, where asymptotically ǫ ∼ 2 π ǫ, as ǫ → 0. With φ thus extended we have the following variant of Theorem 5.1 in [BMMS14]:…”
Section: Mappings Of Y-piecesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last step of the proof is to quasiconfromally embed X ∈ T g,n ( ) into Φ(X) ∈ T g,n (0) in some nice way. We need the following theorem due to Buser-Makover-Muetzel-Silhol ( [5]).…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 15mentioning
confidence: 99%