2012
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/29/21/215012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasilocal conservation laws: why we need them

Abstract: We argue that conservation laws based on the local matter-only stress-energy-momentum tensor (characterized by energy and momentum per unit volume) cannot adequately explain a wide variety of even very simple physical phenomena because they fail to properly account for gravitational effects. We construct a general quasilocal conservation law based on the Brown and York total (matter plus gravity) stress-energy-momentum tensor (characterized by energy and momentum per unit area), and argue that it does properly… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a subtle issue in gravitational physics because of the equivalence principle, which makes localization of gravitational energy (and momentum and angular momentum) fraught with ambiguities [3]. Approaches for addressing this problem date back six decades [4,5] and more, and include a mixture of global [6,7,8,9,10] and quasilocal [11,12,13,14,15] methods. Generalizations to Lovelock gravity have been carried out [16], and a universal form of the boundary term yielding a background-independent definition of conserved quantities for any Lovelock gravity theory with anti-de Sitter (AdS) asymptotics has been constructed [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a subtle issue in gravitational physics because of the equivalence principle, which makes localization of gravitational energy (and momentum and angular momentum) fraught with ambiguities [3]. Approaches for addressing this problem date back six decades [4,5] and more, and include a mixture of global [6,7,8,9,10] and quasilocal [11,12,13,14,15] methods. Generalizations to Lovelock gravity have been carried out [16], and a universal form of the boundary term yielding a background-independent definition of conserved quantities for any Lovelock gravity theory with anti-de Sitter (AdS) asymptotics has been constructed [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…holds. In what follows, we introduce the concept of quasilocal frames [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] and describe the basic steps for their construction, as well as the energy and momentum conservation laws associated therewith. In Subsection II A we offer an heuristic idea of quasilocal frames before proceeding in Subsection II B to present the full mathematical construction.…”
Section: Setup: Quasilocal Conservation Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the past work that has been done with quasilocal frames has in fact been done in the rigid case [46][47][48][49][50][51]. We know however that other quasilocal frame choices are also possible, such as geoids-dubbed geoid quasilocal frames [52,53]: these are the general-relativistic generalization of "constant gravitational potential" surfaces in Newtonian gravity.…”
Section: B Quasilocal Frames: Mathematical Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In such QFs, the gravitational energy flux is −α · P, which is simply the special relativistic rate of change of energy, −a · p, of an object with fourmomentum p as seen by an observer with four-acceleration a, promoted to a general-relativistic energy flux passing through a rigid boundary containing the object: a becomes α, the acceleration of observers on the boundary, and p becomes P, the quasilocal momentum density measured by those observers (via generalrelativistic frame dragging). An equivalence principle-based argument explaining why this must be so is given in [10,11].…”
Section: Conservation Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%