2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.84.165204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasiparticle band structure of Zn-IV-N2compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
92
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(44 reference statements)
9
92
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The relation between this superstructure, with the P na2 1 space group, and the wurtzite unit cell in the ideal case (that is, with no relaxations of the wurtzite atomic positions) is a o = 2a w1 , b o = a w1 +2a w2 , c o = c w , where the subscripts w denote the wurtzite lattice vectors and the subscripts o denote the orthorhombic lattice vectors. The band gap calculated by the quasiparticle self-consistent GW (QSGW ) method 25,26 is in close agreement with the experimental value obtained from near-band-gap luminescence 27 of 3.40 ± 0.01 eV.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The relation between this superstructure, with the P na2 1 space group, and the wurtzite unit cell in the ideal case (that is, with no relaxations of the wurtzite atomic positions) is a o = 2a w1 , b o = a w1 +2a w2 , c o = c w , where the subscripts w denote the wurtzite lattice vectors and the subscripts o denote the orthorhombic lattice vectors. The band gap calculated by the quasiparticle self-consistent GW (QSGW ) method 25,26 is in close agreement with the experimental value obtained from near-band-gap luminescence 27 of 3.40 ± 0.01 eV.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Any systematic errors due to LDA overbinding are expected to drop out of these differences. However, the contrast with previous work 11,26 is that here we used structures that were fully relaxed with respect to a, b and c in addition to the internal atomic coordinates as obtained from the abinit method. This procedure gave us more accurate energies of formation, in particular for ZnSnN 2 , where the differences are small.…”
Section: A First-principles Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations