2013
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
5,994
1
32

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7,832 publications
(6,033 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
5,994
1
32
Order By: Relevance
“…(2013)] with the default parameters and the minimum alignment length of 1000 bp. The genome of Oryza sativa ssp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2013)] with the default parameters and the minimum alignment length of 1000 bp. The genome of Oryza sativa ssp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, genomes recovered from single cells or metagenomic data require careful scrutiny due to the additional complications inherent in obtaining genomes using these approaches (Dick et al 2010;Albertsen et al 2013;Imelfort et al 2014). The quality of isolate genomes has traditionally been evaluated using assembly statistics such as N50 (Salzberg et al 2012;Gurevich et al 2013), but recent single cell and metagenomic studies have also used universal single-copy 'marker' genes for estimating genome completeness (Wrighton et al 2012;Haroon et al 2013;Rinke et al 2013;. Specifically, completeness is estimated as the fraction of expected marker genes present within a genome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nucleotide sequences of all strains were retrieved in FASTA format from the GenBank genome database. The quality of the assemblies for all genomes were assessed by using QUAST version 4.6.3 [9]. Whole genome alignment and Fragment all-against-all comparison analysis was done by using Gegenees software version 2.2.1 with BLAST+ version 2.7.1 installed in the pipeline [10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%