2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quaternary-active thrusts scarps tested as deformation markers by trishear models in the Southern Precordillera of Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alluvial surfaces have been used in many active contractional settings as cumulative deformation markers (e.g., Avouac et al, ; Benedetti et al, ; Bullard & Lettis, ; Davis et al, ; Dolan et al, ; García et al, ; Gold et al, ; Ishiyama et al, , ; Lin et al, ; Mueller & Suppe, ; Vázquez et al, , among others). However, the use of scarp morphometry with these purposes at a detailed scale could be misleading, because scarp profiles are usually modified during and after thrust propagation by processes such as erosion and mass‐transfer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Alluvial surfaces have been used in many active contractional settings as cumulative deformation markers (e.g., Avouac et al, ; Benedetti et al, ; Bullard & Lettis, ; Davis et al, ; Dolan et al, ; García et al, ; Gold et al, ; Ishiyama et al, , ; Lin et al, ; Mueller & Suppe, ; Vázquez et al, , among others). However, the use of scarp morphometry with these purposes at a detailed scale could be misleading, because scarp profiles are usually modified during and after thrust propagation by processes such as erosion and mass‐transfer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thrust propagation at the scale of the study site can also result in inconsistencies between the inner geometry of folding in comparison with the shape of the topographic surface, as predicted by mechanical models and classical sandbox experiments (Cardozo et al, ; Hardy & Allmendinger, ; Hardy & Finch, ; Johnson & Johnson, ; Takao et al, ). These issues prevent modeling the accumulated thrust shortening by restoring the current scarp profile through line‐balancing methods (Woodward et al, ), which can account for the uplift produced by the thrust displacement but may result in underestimating shortening and the related slip of the structure (Vázquez et al, ). We also did not apply the balancing methods proposed by Suppe and Medwedeff (), because nonparallel‐type folding of the Quaternary cover related to the propagation of the Las Peñas thrust has been reported for this structure elsewhere (Schmidt, Hetzel, Mingorance, & Ramos, ; Vázquez et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, uncertainty for the displacement measurements cannot be quantified because best fit is based on visual inspection. Several studies which use FFF modeling as one of the approaches to measure displacement on reverse fault scarps also in Argentina used this same trial‐and‐error and visual estimation approach for determining the model that best fits the actual faulted profile (Costa, Ahumada, Vázquez, & Kröhling, ; Vázquez et al, ). Using the fault dip value at the surface, the displacement was then resolved into components of shortening and uplift.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%