2009
DOI: 10.1029/2007tc002227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quaternary rift flank uplift of the Peninsular Ranges in Baja and southern California by removal of mantle lithosphere

Abstract: Regional uplift in southern California, USA, and northern Baja California, Mexico, is interpreted to result from flexure of the elastic lithosphere driven largely by heating and thinning of the upper mantle beneath the Gulf of California and eastern Peninsular Ranges. The geometry and timing of faulting in the Salton Trough and Gulf of California, the history of recent rock uplift along the Pacific coastline, and geophysical data constrain models of lithospheric heating and thinning based on unloading of a con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their model, uplift in this region is caused primarily by upwelling beneath the Peninsular Ranges of southern California and the northern Gulf of California (Mexico), due to upper-mantle heating and thinning. The mantle upwelling model proposed by Mueller et al (2009) for southernmost California and northern Baja California may not be applicable to the present study, however, as the Channel Islands are well north of the area for which their model was considered.…”
Section: Cause Of Slow Tectonic Uplift Of the Northern Channel Islandmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In their model, uplift in this region is caused primarily by upwelling beneath the Peninsular Ranges of southern California and the northern Gulf of California (Mexico), due to upper-mantle heating and thinning. The mantle upwelling model proposed by Mueller et al (2009) for southernmost California and northern Baja California may not be applicable to the present study, however, as the Channel Islands are well north of the area for which their model was considered.…”
Section: Cause Of Slow Tectonic Uplift Of the Northern Channel Islandmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Elsewhere, studies by Ashby et al (1987), Sirkin et al (1990) and Johnson et al (2007) at Mulege, La Paz, Isla Coronados, and Punta Chivato (see Table 2 for U-series data for the latter two localities) indicate just a few meters of uplift of thẽ 120 ka terrace, yielding uplift rates of less than 0.1 m/ka. Thus, although Mueller et al (2009) proposed that there is no Quaternary coastal uplift south of Bahía de Tortugas in Baja California (Figs. 1 and 18), several localities do indicate at least modest amounts of late Quaternary uplift.…”
Section: Comparison Of Channel Islands Uplift Rates With Other Localimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1; Stock and Hodges, 1989;Mueller et al, 2009). In addition to these larger-scale features, smaller faults and folds also occur along the Pacific coast and offshore regions, mostly accommodating the overall crustal motions across the major tectonic boundaries (Kelsey, 1990;Plesch et al, 2007;Gurrola et al, 2014).…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since that work, several authors have used the difference between the elevation of marine terraces and "global" sea levels to determine uplift rates for tectonic structures across the northern Mexico, California, Oregon, and Washington coasts. These uplift rates have provided important insights into the behavior of major tectonic features, including the Cascadia subduction zone (Muhs et al, 1990;James et al, 2009), the Mendocino triple junction (Merritts and Bull, 1989), the San Andreas fault zone (Anderson and Menking, 1994;Grove et al, 2010), and seafloor spreading centers in the Gulf of California (Mueller et al, 2009), as well as the many local faults and folds along the Pacific coast of central North America ( Fig. 1; Rockwell et al, 1989;Hanson et al, 1992;Kelsey et al, 1996;Grant et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%