Tephra Studies 1981
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-8537-7_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quaternary Tephra of Northern Central America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combined total volume of ash-flow and ash-fall deposits less than approximately 200 ka is conservatively estimated between 300 and 500 km 3 ), similar to the volume of andesitic and basaltic material erupted from the youngest generation of volcanic front volcanoes. Activity at silicic calderas largely antedates but partly overlaps activity of the present generation of F50 ka and younger composite volcanoes (Koch and McLean 1975;Rose et al 1981;Conway et al 1994).…”
Section: Volcanic Settingmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The combined total volume of ash-flow and ash-fall deposits less than approximately 200 ka is conservatively estimated between 300 and 500 km 3 ), similar to the volume of andesitic and basaltic material erupted from the youngest generation of volcanic front volcanoes. Activity at silicic calderas largely antedates but partly overlaps activity of the present generation of F50 ka and younger composite volcanoes (Koch and McLean 1975;Rose et al 1981;Conway et al 1994).…”
Section: Volcanic Settingmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This allowed for accurate volume estimates of tephra units and resolved questions about source vents Drexler 1979;Hahn et al 1979;Wunderman and Rose 1984;Rose et al 1987;Peterson and Rose 1985). Deposits of young (~200 ka) silicic centers in northern Central America comprise numerous fall deposits and at least ten pyroclastic flow deposits (Koch and McLean 1975;Rose et al 1981). Koch and McLean (1975) recognized two stratigraphic successions in the Volcanic Highlands.…”
Section: Volcanic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Guatemala, basaltic to andesitic magmas have been erupted mainly from composite cones of the volcanic arc front, whereas dacitic to rhyolitic lavas and tuffs occur mainly in backarc calderas and dome complexes (Halsor and Rose, 1988). Several Quaternary to Holocene composite cones, domes, and cal deras surround Santa María and have erupted subequal volumes of chemically bimodal mafi c and silicic products (Rose et al, 1981;Rose, 1987). Volcanism at Santa María-Santiaguito is also bimodal, including roughly equal volumes of basaltic-andesitic (~8 km 3 ) and dacitic (~9 km 3 ) lava and tephra.…”
Section: Geology and Volcanologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, ESR has been used along with classical magnetic methods to characterize clays and volcanic materials, mainly glasses (Bart et al 1982;Bonnin et al 1982;Schlinger et al 1988;Pawse et al 1998;Balan et al 1999). Indeed, some recent ash layers are not unambiguously attributed to a well-known historical event (Rose et al 1981), and are difficult to discriminate based on their chemistry (Palias et al 1990). Both techniques are sensitive to various parameters (chemical environment, oxidation state, composition, grain size and shape, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques can thus be of general interest for tephro-stratigraphy. Indeed, some recent ash layers are not unambiguously attributed to a well-known historical event (Rose et al 1981), and are difficult to discriminate based on their chemistry (Palias et al 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%