“…We argue that the very heterogeneity of past cultural and ecological data is what necessitates formal, transdisciplinary model-building approaches; stating problems in clear probabilistic and/or mathematical terms is the only way to directly account for the sheer variety of different data sources and their inherent issues. Computational modelling makes it possible to analyze and synthesize information from different sources, such as Neotoma [153], SESHAT [154], various continental-scale pollen databases [155][156][157], ArchaeoGlobe [158], LandCover6k [159], People3k [160], the Paleobiology database (https://paleobiodb.org/ accessed on 1 June 2022), HYDE [161], and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (https://www.gbif.org/ accessed on 1 June 2022). To account for often wildly varying quality, including but not limited to coverage, resolution, or the various inherent uncertainties of, for example, chronometric, species identification, and cultural data, such computational models can be constructed in such a way as to incorporate insights from a variety of sources and disciplines concurrently.…”